Dear Jacob,
closely related to Ethan's explanation, but not quite the same, the
contribution of f' and f" is still affected by the fall off from the ADPs, i.e.
they also fall off exponentially, even for high quality crystals with a very
low B-factors.
The effect that you describe, however, sti
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 11:23:34 AM PDT Keller, Jacob wrote:
> Dear Crystallographers,
>
> It seems to be a usual assumption that anomalous scattering is essentially
> angularly-independent, e.g.:
>
> http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/diff1/anomscat.htm
>
> But why the can't we see anomalous-onl
Dear Crystallographers,
It seems to be a usual assumption that anomalous scattering is essentially
angularly-independent, e.g.:
http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/diff1/anomscat.htm
But why the can't we see anomalous-only spots at e.g. 1 Ang resolution in a 2
Ang data set?
This actually has some r
