Hi Ray,
Not necessarily close to 1.00 but rather 1.00 or lower.
Cheers,
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Brown [mailto:ray-br...@att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 15:56
To: Robbie Joosten
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question
Hi Robbie
Joosten wrote:
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2019, 4:58 AM
Hi Ray,
This is how I see it: Because different bond
length and angle target tolerances/sigmas you cannot compare
them on an absolute scale. What is less
with the geometric
restraint weights.
HTH,
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Raymond
Brown
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 17:11
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question
Hi folks,
What are accepta
Hi folks,
What are acceptable values for RMS Bond length, RMS Bond angle and RMS Chiral
volume?
The tutorial suggests RMS Bond length of 0.0200?
I would like to hear your suggestions and/or rationale.
Many thanks
Ray Brown
#
