Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Keller, Jacob
, 2014 3:26 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Hi All, A major opportunity with Pilatus detectors is the chance to redistribute the dose in reciprocal space i.e. measure a lot more data, with less dose / frame, then decide in hindsight where

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Christophe Wirth
like during data collection. > >> I think there was a publication from Diamond > Synchrotron discussing > >> strategies of data collection with Pilatus. > >> We've done a little bit of systematic studies as well > and while things > >> may well be sample- and

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Graeme Winter
xtremely slow which would be the case with thin frames and long > >>> exposure times. In this case the speed may not remain as constant as we > >>> would like during data collection. > >>> I think there was a publication from Diamond Synchrotron discussing > >&

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Tim Gruene
facility-dependent, ~0.2 degree frames with ~0.2 >>> sec exposure time seemed to make good compromise between above-mentioned >>> issues. Here I would like to emphasize again - there certainly will be >>> samples which will benefit from somewhat different parameters. >>

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Graeme Winter
emphasize again - there certainly will be >> samples which will benefit from somewhat different parameters. >> Hope it helps, >> Cheers, >> N. >> >> Ruslan Sanishvili (Nukri) >> Macromolecular Crystallographer >> GM/CA@APS >> X-ray Science Divisi

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-04-30 Thread Harry Powell
Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy was a sort of compromise between number

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-04-30 Thread Sanishvili, Ruslan
on behalf of Keller, Jacob [kell...@janelia.hhmi.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the

[ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-04-30 Thread Keller, Jacob
Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy was a sort of compromise between number of images and detector readout noise "overhead." I have heard that Pilatus detectors, however, have essentially no readout no