gt; Ethan Merritt
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 23:59
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo and biased/unbiased R-free
>
> On Tuesday, 06 February 2018 17:25:13 Nadia Leloup wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I was looking at a 3 angstr
On Tuesday, 06 February 2018 17:25:13 Nadia Leloup wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was looking at a 3 angstrom structure from 2015 with relatively bad
> statistics, so I decided to look at the pdb-redo of said structure.
> Surprisingly, pdb-redo statistics are even worse.
You say "even worse", but the
Dear all,
I was looking at a 3 angstrom structure from 2015 with relatively bad
statistics, so I decided to look at the pdb-redo of said structure.
Surprisingly, pdb-redo statistics are even worse. As you can see on the
attached picture, the pdb-redo Rfree comes with a caveat:
R-free was consider