Dear Kay,
Thank you for your reply to our message.
Your "few remarks" actually raise a considerable number of interrelated
matters that need to be considered in their totality rather than piecemeal,
so this reply will necessarily be rather lengthy.
It was in any case our purpose
evious
posts that you shouldn't treat your data in any other way than selection.
Cheers,
Robbie
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Kay
> Diederichs
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 12:33
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [cc
Dear Gerard,
I'm not going to comment on what others said in this (new) thread; just trying
to make a few remarks about what you write below -
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:01:10 +0100, Gerard Bricogne
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
> First of all, apologies for breaking the threads entitled "PAIREF -
>War
Dear Gerard,
You state in the PAIREF discussion that:
“…cut-off threshold for the local average of I/sig(I) in STARANISO, whose
default value is currently 1.2 but can be reset by the user through the Web
server's GUI.”
Can this value be changed when running Autoproc/Staraniso from the command
ame. We
> should perhaps follow up separately about this particular dataset, but the
> general suggestion we would make is that, when conducting investigations on
> such matters as the benefits of PAIREF, it would be advisable to either use
> a much larger number of data
t wishes,
Clemens, Claus, Ian and Gerard.
> ____
> From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Gerard
> Bricogne
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 6:01:10 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] PAIREF, Anisotropy and STARANISO
>
&
solutions.
My 2 cents,
Herman
Von: CCP4 bulletin board Im Auftrag von Martin Malý
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2022 14:13
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] PAIREF, Anisotropy and STARANISO
Dear colleagues,
Firstly, I would like to thank Clemens, Claus, Ian and Gerard for the very
Dear colleagues,
Firstly, I would like to thank Clemens, Claus, Ian and Gerard for the
very interesting analysis and remarks!
Similarly to Frank, I am wondering "whether any refinement program
properly extracts the high-resolution signal when there's anisotropy".
Poor completeness in high re
Gerard, that's fascinating, thanks for the explanation.
I conclude in summary: nobody (including you) yet knows whether any
refinement program properly extracts the high-resolution signal when
there's anisotropy.
My (similar) question a few days ago was: /"Is that because of the
practicalit
Dear Clemens, Claus, Ian and Gerard,
since you ask for crowd sourcing, I'll give you my thoughts.
I think the term "anisotropy" is used in many ways to describe very
different events. It actually means the opposite of isotropy, so it is
coviniently used to describe a difference in resolution li
f of Gerard Bricogne
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 6:01:10 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] PAIREF, Anisotropy and STARANISO
Dear all,
First of all, apologies for breaking the threads entitled "PAIREF -
Warning - not enough free reflections in resolution bin" and &qu
Dear all,
First of all, apologies for breaking the threads entitled "PAIREF -
Warning - not enough free reflections in resolution bin" and "Anisotropy" by
merging them into a new one, but it somehow felt rather against nature to
keep them separate.
Since the early days of the availabili
12 matches
Mail list logo
