Re: [ccp4bb] New restraints, same name

2012-01-25 Thread Garib N Murshudov
That is the plan and hopefully with help of people from pdb coot, buster, phenix, refmac, ccp4 programs will all use mmcif with ligand descriptions inside. Good will is there, a little bit work is needed. Regards Garib On 25 Jan 2012, at 08:15, Ingo P. Korndoerfer wrote: > ... and why don't w

Re: [ccp4bb] New restraints, same name

2012-01-25 Thread Ingo P. Korndoerfer
... and why don't we move on from pdb format to something a bit more modern ? i think it would only require a handful of programmers to agree on this and the rest would (have to) follow. i.e. if coot and refmac could both read and write something more modern we'd have a huge part of ccp4 world co