Three years is starting to be a reasonable time interval to see interesting
scientific progress. On the 1 or 2 years time scale it is hard, as anyone
organizing annual meetings will tell you.
One thing I would do is to browse the abstracts of the most recent American
Crystallographic Associatio
Dear Lena,
Structural biology has made enormous progress in the last two decades
but it has essentially been a cumulative process involving many people
and ideas. If you have to restrict the choice to a "solve structure"
button within the last three years then I would vote for Isabel Uson's
AR
Oh wow, talk about challenging a community to confront their own worst
fears of stagnation and irrelevance! Hehe - never mind cat in the
pigeons, more like a man-eating tiger in a shanty-town.
Wouldn't top of the list be "dwindling budget priority"? :-)
But okay, back to specifically structu
Dear CCP4ers,
after 3 years without working in structural biology and crystallography,
this summer I will have my PhD defence. As I am now working in a complete
different field I would be happy to know what happened in structural biology
the last years worth to mention. Is there finally the "solve
