Thanks!
> According to the really good documentation of O, e.g. at
> http://xray.bmc.uu.se/alwyn/A-Z_of_O/A-Z_frameset.html
> you have to use the command "fm_mode" to change this (and while doing so
> might
> read Alwyns "FM_Overview" in the same documentation which I just did and
> found
> very in
The main advantage of contouring in absolute units is consistency.
The density for a water molecule with a B factor of 20 A^2 will look
about the same even if the "noise" level of one map is higher than
another. (Within limits, of course) This means that the actual value
you contour at isn't a
According to the really good documentation of O, e.g. at
http://xray.bmc.uu.se/alwyn/A-Z_of_O/A-Z_frameset.html
you have to use the command "fm_mode" to change this (and while doing so might
read Alwyns "FM_Overview" in the same documentation which I just did and found
very interesting!).
Cheers,
Hi,
It can, just do
fm-mode
select rmsd
I am curious though, I have heard that it is 'better' to build in
units of absolute density, but I couldn't find any values. Does any
one have a suggestion as to what absolute electron density setting is
'correct' for an Fo-Fc difference map? Or do you jus
Hi,
I generated a map using FFT, and tried to display it in O. By comparing
with coot, I found that the "level" in O seems to be the absolute electron
density instead of the sigma level. I am sorry I ask a question more
related to O: can O draw the map by a given sigma level instead of the
absolut
