I would suggest that with 3.1 A data and only half of the scattering
mass known,
experimental phases would be an easier and better way to go than
refining the molrep solution.
Even sulphur phases could add if nicely measured, since you would
find the S easily
in the anomalous Fourier; but of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Uhnsoo,
AMoRe will not run the translation function for the **first** body (an
hetero-dimer in your case) because in P1 the origin is arbitrary and
hence fixed by the first rotation solution. Now, if you think that the
first solution from the rotat
Uhnsoo,
Well you only have half of your 4-heterodimers, so your phases are poor,
particularly for the missing 50% of your structure. DM and NCS
averaging/solvent flattening will only work if the missing 50% can be
properly masked. One possible out from this hole is to try RESOLVE. If
you tell R
Dear all,
Recently, I've gotten a 3.1A data set with a P1 space group. Based on a Mattchew
coefficient, I have 4 hetero-dimer molecules in one asymmetric unit. Because one
of the dimers was known already, I tried MR with a program Phaser and molrep
(Amore doesn't calculate a translation function
