Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-26 Thread B.Lohkamp
Hi Daniele, we had a possibly similar case and in collaboration with Andrey Lebedev we demodulated the data using different methods including a novel method, DIGS, (see Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, 1680–1694). We have a few scripts to analyse the data and to use the described methods. Sadly we ne

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-12 Thread Eleanor Dodson
r. > > Good luck! > Herman > > *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board *Im Auftrag von *Wim > Burmeister > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 08:57 > *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > *Betreff:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD) > > > *EXTERNAL : *R

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-12 Thread Harry Powell - CCP4BB
tical > disorder. > > Good luck! > Herman > > Von: CCP4 bulletin board <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>> Im Auftrag von Wim Burmeister > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 08:57 > An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> > Betreff: [

[ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-12 Thread Schreuder, Herman /DE
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 08:57 An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD) EXTERNAL : Real sender is owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk> Hello, do you have some details about the space group ? D

Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-12 Thread Harry Powell - CCP4BB
Hi Apropos Mosflm - if you have HDF5 files from ESRF (or Diamond, probably elsewhere) you can sum the images internally to whatever rotation range per pseudo image you want (so if you have, say, 0.05º physical images you could process 0.1, 0.15, 0.20º, etc), provided you have installed Mosflm 7

Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-11 Thread Wim Burmeister
Hello, do you have some details about the space group ? Did the integration not miss any sports ? I would rather think of an ncs close to crystallographic symmetry, or maybe some twinning problem. I guess these are Pilatus data, can you combine the frames

Re: [ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-11 Thread 00000c2488af9525-dmarc-request
I was wondering why you believe it is a lattice defect rather than NCS. How well does the structure refine and does it have NCS? Do the twinning tests suggest anything?Jon CooperOn 11 Feb 2020 21:31, Daniele de Sanctis wrote:Hi all,I'm currently dealing with what I think it is a case of LTD (off-o

[ccp4bb] Lattice-translocation defect (LTD)

2020-02-11 Thread Daniele de Sanctis
Hi all, I'm currently dealing with what I think it is a case of LTD (off-origin Patterson peak, with vector along w of ~ 7A and electron density map showing a "ghost" map shifted by 7 A). I saw there are quite a few cases reported in literature (for example Hare et al, 2006), but what I could not