//www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp
>>
>>
>> Original message
>>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:50:04 +0100
>>> From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of Anastassis
>>> Perrakis )
>>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Introd
b.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
> http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp
>
>
> Original message
>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:50:04 +0100
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of Anasta
+0100
>From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of Anastassis
>Perrakis )
>Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Introducing an ELN
>To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>
> I think that all these points are interesting and
> valid.
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 10:37, Chris Morris wrote:
>
>
I think that all these points are interesting and valid.
On Jan 25, 2012, at 10:37, Chris Morris wrote:
Tassos reports:
1. None of the twenty test-users was satisfied with any of the two
solutions - and each was annoyed for a different reason.
This suggests that the choice of ELN is not the
Tassos reports:
> 1. None of the twenty test-users was satisfied with any of the two
> solutions - and each was annoyed for a different reason.
This suggests that the choice of ELN is not the most difficult part of the
adoption process. Maybe the test users at the NKI were annoyed by the idea of
