Jim Pflugrath wrote:
In addition to reducing the beam divergence, you may wish to use a
smaller beam size by using a smaller collimator or making the slits
smaller. A smaller crystal can also help to spatially separate the Bragg
spots as can moving the detector closer to the crystal. Yes, closer
In addition to all the excellent suggestions if you can you can also move your
detector away from the center of the beam aka increase the detector size in one
dimension. Not sure if you can do that at your home source though. By moving
the center of the beam say to the lower 9/10 of the detector
my experiences:
C2 with a long axis parallel to the shortest crystal dimension, crystals were
plates. Used prebent loops to fish the crystals. Personally I haven't tried to
bend loops in mounted crystals as Frank does, but it sounds very useful.
bar-shaped P321 crystals with hexagonal cross-secti
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] How to reduce no. of overlaps
Dear Crystallographers,
I am working on a protein having SG P6, the cell parameters are a= 79, b= 79,
c= 325. The crystals are forming in big size and with very good shape. It also
diffracting very well in Home source facility
om/product_detail.aspx?cid=24&sid=136&pid=385>
*From:* Frank von Delft <mailto:frank.vonde...@sgc.ox.ac.uk>
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:26 AM
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
*Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] How to reduce no. of overlaps
You prob
In addition to reducing the beam divergence, you may wish to use a smaller beam
size by using a smaller collimator or making the slits smaller. A smaller
crystal can also help to spatially separate the Bragg spots as can moving the
detector closer to the crystal. Yes, closer to the crystal. Th
Hampton sells an adjustable mounted loop for this purpose.
http://hamptonresearch.com/product_detail.aspx?cid=24&sid=136&pid=385
From: Frank von Delft
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:26 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] How to reduce no. of overlaps
You probably
Yes... quite. Thanks!
(Beam, rotation axis... how can you expect me to keep all these
new-fangled inventions apart?!)
On 07/03/2012 07:33, VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN wrote:
typo correction, you'll want the long axis parallel to the rotation
axis, not to the beam.
Mark
Quoting Frank von Delft:
typo correction, you'll want the long axis parallel to the rotation
axis, not to the beam.
Mark
Quoting Frank von Delft:
You probably have to tilt your crystal, so that the long axis is
parallel to the beam. We do this routinely: cut a plastic pipette
tip to have a sharp point, then push
You probably have to tilt your crystal, so that the long axis is
parallel to the beam. We do this routinely: cut a plastic pipette tip
to have a sharp point, then push the loop where it attaches to the pin,
to bend the crystal itself.
You have to identify from your diffraction whether the lo
Dear Crystallographers,
I am working on a protein having SG P6, the cell parameters are a= 79, b= 79,
c= 325. The crystals are forming in big size and with very good shape. It also
diffracting very well in Home source facility both in terms of resolution and
intensity. But the only problem is t
11 matches
Mail list logo