significant
>>>>> portions of both researchers and students who did not have such access,
>>>>> the
>>>>> NIH open access policy was by itself a major game changer, making much
>>>>> more
>>>>> literature rapidly accessible
letin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with
preventing
the
encouragement people
Dear Colleagues,
Acta participates very nicely and fully in the NIH Open Access
program. After
one year of the normal restricted access any NIH-funded paper automatically
enters the NIH open access system. The journals get to get their
revenue when
the paper is most in demand, but the com
16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with
preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do
with
trying to kill the very reasonabl
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with
preventing
the
encouragement people to bre
gt; http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/action/action_access/12-0106.shtml
>> >
>> > http://www.care2.com/causes/open-access-under-threat-hr-3699.html
>> >
>> > Please support the petition. This is a very bad bill. It is not about
>> > protecting copyright, it is an eff
?
>>
>> What I read seems reasonable and I intend to ask my representatives to
>> support this text. But obviously I am missing something and like to learn
>> from you first.
>>
>> Regards
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>
gt; Herbert
>>
>> On 2/16/12 9:02 AM, Fischmann, Thierry wrote:
>>>
>>> Herbert
>>>
>>> I don't see how the act could affect the NIH open access policy. Could you
>>> please shed some light on that?
>>>
>>> What I read seems
> Can non-US based scientists sign the petition, btw?
Well there's nothing to stop you! It asks for your zip code, but I
just left it blank and it accepted it.
Cheers
-- Ian
: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do with
trying to kill the
n access policy. Could you
>> please shed some light on that?
>>
>> What I read seems reasonable and I intend to ask my representatives to
>> support this text. But obviously I am missing something and like to learn
>> from you first.
>>
>> Regards
>&
uld affect the NIH open access policy. Could you
>> please shed some light on that?
>>
>> What I read seems reasonable and I intend to ask my representatives to
>> support this text. But obviously I am missing something and like to learn
>> from you first.
>>
&g
.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Herbert
J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do with
trying to kill the very reasonable NIH open access policy that properly
balances the rights of publishers with the rights of authors and
Reading the H.R.3699 bill as put forward
(http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HR03699:@@@L&summ2=m&;)
it seems to be about prohibiting US federal agencies from having
policies which permit, authorise or require authors' assent to break
the law of copyright in respect of published journal a
nan
> Fax: 972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Tim Gruene
> [t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:35 AM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.
: HR3699, Research Works Act
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Raji,
maybe you could increase the number of supporters if you included a link
to (a description of) the content of HR3699 - I will certainly not sign
something only summarised by a few polemic sentences ;-)
Cheers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Raji,
maybe you could increase the number of supporters if you included a link
to (a description of) the content of HR3699 - I will certainly not sign
something only summarised by a few polemic sentences ;-)
Cheers,
Tim
On 02/15/2012 11:53 PM,
If you agree, please signing the petition below. You need to register on
the link below before you can sign this petition. Registration and signing
the petition took about a minute or two.
Cheers,
Raji
-- Forwarded message --
From: Seth Darst
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM
S
19 matches
Mail list logo
