Dont forget all the "atomic resolution" 3Å structures!
From: Pavel Afonine [pafon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 6:23 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: [ccp4bb] FW: [ccp4bb] Resolution and distance
accu
ariables (the single-bond torsion angles)"
> >
> >
> >
> > Overall this seems a reasonable claim.
> >
> > Colin
> >
> >
> >
> > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
> Charles W. Carter, Jr
> &g
ile at the same time using a minimal set of
> variables (the single-bond torsion angles)"
>
>
>
> Overall this seems a reasonable claim.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Charles
> W. Carter,
Maybe if you are really into this, you could "go public" by writing a
letter to the editor (from the CCP4BB?), and I am sure there will be a
good response from the authors...
Jacob
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training
Behalf Of Charles
W. Carter, Jr
Sent: 06 January 2011 09:52
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Fwd: [ccp4bb] FW: [ccp4bb] Resolution and distance accuracies
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Charles W. Carter, Jr"
Date: January 6, 2011 10:51:20 AM GMT+01:00
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Charles W. Carter, Jr"
> Date: January 6, 2011 10:51:20 AM GMT+01:00
> To: Gerard Bricogne
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] FW: [ccp4bb] Resolution and distance accuracies
>
> I echo Gérard's thought.
>
> Pascal Retailleau did a relevant experiment published in Acta
