Yes, I should explain better "that might not justify all your
observations"; in more details, if such care (free set considered the twin
law) was not taken it is probable that the gap between R and R-free is even
larger, as Anastassis points. Might R-free become a "reasonable" value in
this
But, if that was the case, wouldn't you expect the opposite, Rfree to
be too close to R ?
here they appear to be too different !
in other words: if Rfree is not 'really free due to twin law' i would
expect R/Rfree to be too close, not too far !
A.
On Oct 23, 2007, at 13:58, Jorge Iulek wro
John,
One other point to be added, although that might not justify all your
observations, is to be sure that the R-free set was chosen respecting the
twin law. Both phenix and CNS (not automatically) can do this. Of course, as
pointed before, when you change your R-free set, you should "ann
