Re: [ccp4bb] Data reduction

2015-05-27 Thread Zbyszek Otwinowski
These are two different types of completness indicators Scalepack reports Bragg's law completness, 98.8% of your unique reflections were in diffracting condition. If you use automatic corrections only informative reflections are output, for anisotropic diffraction 64% is reasonable > Hi All, > > S

[ccp4bb] Data reduction

2015-05-27 Thread Bio Physics
Hi All, Scalepack output says 98.8% complete data but after converted to .mtz file it reduced to 64%. I have tried in CCP4 and phenix both. How is it possible? Ayan

Re: [ccp4bb] data reduction

2009-10-29 Thread Doletha Marian Szebenyi
Alex, With regard to scalepack, be sure you use NO MERGE ORIGINAL INDEX, not just NO MERGE. Marian Szebenyi MacCHESS > Dear all: > > I am trying to solve a structure from apparently a hexagonal crystal. > I indexed and scaled data in P6 in Scalepack (with merging) then used > Scalepack2mtz (wit

Re: [ccp4bb] data reduction

2009-10-29 Thread Zbyszek Otwinowski
Dear Eleanor, Even if Denzo, Scalepack and HKL suite have been extensively developed, their file formats have not changed in many years. However, there are intermediate programs between Scalepack and structure solution ones that can potentially be a source of problem. For example, ctruncate for so

Re: [ccp4bb] data reduction

2009-10-29 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Can you sed a bit of your scalepack unmerged data - that would allow us to check format and pointless behavior.. It sounds a bit like a scalepack problem though.. Eleanor Alexandra Deaconescu wrote: Dear all: I am trying to solve a structure from apparently a hexagonal crystal. I indexed an

[ccp4bb] data reduction

2009-10-28 Thread Alexandra Deaconescu
Dear all: I am trying to solve a structure from apparently a hexagonal crystal. I indexed and scaled data in P6 in Scalepack (with merging) then used Scalepack2mtz (with ensure unique reflections and add Rfree as well as the truncate procedure), and then attempted to run molecular replac