> If I am not wrong, I remember that someone proposed to standardize
> B-factors of protein atoms as “BS = B - Bave”, where Bave is the average
> B-factor of the protein.
This will make some of BS negative (if B
Dear Oliviero,
On one aspect of your query, this analysis dissected the different sources
of disorder contributions to B factors:-
Diamond, R Acta Cryst (1990). *A46*, 425-435
All best wishes,
John
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Oliviero Carugo <
oliviero.car...@univie.ac.at> wrote:
> Dears,
>
On Thursday, 05 April 2018 15:49:44 Oliviero Carugo wrote:
> Dears,
>
> everybody knows that B-factors may change amongst different crystal
> structures and that they need to be standardized when different protein
> crystal structures are compared.
>
> If I am not wrong, I remember that someone
Oliviero,
We published a paper in 2003 in which we normalized B-factors
to do a comparison of relative mobility or flexibility. The reference
is: Gourinath et al. Structure 11:1621-1627 (2003). The jargon
we used for Bave of the protein is . In our case, to be
conservative in our interpretatio
Dears,
everybody knows that B-factors may change amongst different crystal
structures and that they need to be standardized when different protein
crystal structures are compared.
If I am not wrong, I remember that someone proposed to standardize
B-factors of protein atoms as “BS = B - Bave”
