On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 02:46:21 pm Ian Tickle wrote:
> Jacob,
>
> Actually the R factors including the Bijvoet pairs would be higher,
> because the uncertainties in F(+) and F(-) are higher than that of
> F(mean) by a factor of about sqrt(2). R factors will always be higher
> for unmerged d
Jacob,
Actually the R factors including the Bijvoet pairs would be higher,
because the uncertainties in F(+) and F(-) are higher than that of
F(mean) by a factor of about sqrt(2). R factors will always be higher
for unmerged data because averaging always reduces the uncertainty.
This means that w
On Jan 10, 2012, at 22:00 , Jacob Keller wrote:
> Dear Crystallographers,
>
> it seems to me that on a certain level we are always throwing away
> (sort of) about half of our data when we merge Bijvoet pairs--why
Who "We" ?
> shouldn't we keep them separate, since we know that they should be
Dear Crystallographers,
it seems to me that on a certain level we are always throwing away
(sort of) about half of our data when we merge Bijvoet pairs--why
shouldn't we keep them separate, since we know that they should be a
little bit different, especially in light of the higher multiplicities
w
