apt to the particular spot where happen to be. And indeed,
>plants
>> have usually more genes then animals!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Herman
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *Im Auftrag
>von
>> *
be. And indeed, plants
> have usually more genes then animals!
>
> Best,
>
> Herman
>
>
>
> *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *Im Auftrag von
> *John R Helliwell
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 20. September 2019 09:19
> *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
indeed, plants have usually more
genes then animals!
Best,
Herman
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von John R
Helliwell
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. September 2019 09:19
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] challenges in structural
Dear Martin,
Many thanks for these details of the size of the human genome over the decades
and also the news of your most interesting upcoming review. I shall read it
with great interest.
Incidentally is the over 4 genes for the rice genome number correct? This
number caught my eye as being
Dear John,
the „100,000 human genes“ is a long-standing myth broad forward by the
initiators of the U.S. human genome sequencing projects in 1990. This large
number completely contradicted all genetics and mutation data since the 1940th,
but the sequencing community (genome, cDNA, EST) didn’t re