Dear all,
after a week looking more closely into the datasets, also with the help of
Manfred Weiss and Kay Diederichs, who kindly offered to look at some of
them, I come back to you to report on our findings (should this info be
useful in the future to any of you). Thank you very much everybody fo
Herman
>
> Von: Almudena Ponce Salvatierra <mailto:maps.fa...@gmail.com>>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 30. November 2019 11:00
> An: Schreuder, Herman /DE <mailto:herman.schreu...@sanofi.com>>
> Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Betreff: Re
: Samstag, 30. November 2019 11:00
An: Schreuder, Herman /DE
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] 8/ 2263 spots indexed XDS
EXTERNAL : Real sender is maps.fa...@gmail.com<mailto:maps.fa...@gmail.com>
Hi Herman,
thank you for your answer. Yes, my data were collected
Hi Almu,
some other pointers that might be useful in your case:
* Check the list of known beamline configurations (and particulars)
at [1] and [2] to see if there is something you need to tell the
processing software about.
* If you have multiple lattices, split spots or ice rings (or
Hi Raphael,
Thank you very much. I tried yesterday with different origins and I have
changed the REFINE(IDXREF) keyword several times as to refine BEAM,
POSITION, DISTANCE... I have to keep trying because fo far I didn't succeed.
I will get back to you once I find what the problem is.
Thank you
> De : CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] de la part de Almudena
> Ponce Salvatierra [maps.fa...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 29 novembre 2019 12:48
> À : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : [ccp4bb] 8/ 2263 spots indexed XDS
>
> Dear all,
>
sing the refined
> parameters of the successful run.
>
>
>
> Good luck!
>
> Herman
>
>
>
> *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board *Im Auftrag von *Almudena
> Ponce Salvatierra
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 29. November 2019 12:48
> *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Betre
Hi Tim,
Thank you very much for replying.
I thought this was the keyword I was looking for indeed, however, it has
not worked so far... :(
I will write back once I find out what the problem was.
Best,
Almu
El vie., 29 nov. 2019 a las 14:43, Tim Gruene ()
escribió:
> Dear Almudena,
>
> SPOT_M
Hi Almu,
I have yet to see a data set with clear reflections that cannot be indexed with
XDS. The most often reason for failure is some wrong input, most often
ORGX/ORGY and ROTATION_AXIS, but of course OSCILLATION_RANGE, X-RAY_WAVELENGTH,
DETECTOR_DISTANCE must also be correct.
If you cannot s
Thank you Tim,
I will try and let you know how it goes.
All the best,
Almudena
El vie., 29 nov. 2019 a las 14:43, Tim Gruene ()
escribió:
> Dear Almudena,
>
> SPOT_MAXIMUM-CENTROID is probably the keyword in XDS.INP that you want to
> increase in your situation. The default is 3. Try e.g. 5, a
Dear Almudena,
SPOT_MAXIMUM-CENTROID is probably the keyword in XDS.INP that you want to
increase in your situation. The default is 3. Try e.g. 5, and increase slowly
to make sure that the suggested solution makes sense
Best regards,
Tim
On Friday, November 29, 2019 12:48:11 PM CET Almudena Po
: CCP4 bulletin board Im Auftrag von Almudena Ponce
Salvatierra
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. November 2019 12:48
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] 8/ 2263 spots indexed XDS
EXTERNAL : Real sender is
owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Dear all,
om]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 novembre 2019 12:48
À : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Objet : [ccp4bb] 8/ 2263 spots indexed XDS
Dear all,
I have some data sets that don't want to be processed :p
In one of them, when I look at IDXREF.LP I see virtually none of the found
spots were indexed and the reason
Dear all,
I have some data sets that don't want to be processed :p
In one of them, when I look at IDXREF.LP I see virtually none of the found
spots were indexed and the reason is that they are "too far from the
expected position". The spots are smeary and elongated, so not the
prettiest.
I have
14 matches
Mail list logo
