Am 04.03.2011 11:11, schrieb Kay Diederichs:
There is nothing wrong with R_meas of 147.1% since, as others have said,
R_meas is not limited to 59% (or similar) as a refinement R-factor is.
Rather, R_meas is computed from a formula that has a denominator which
in the asymptotic limit (noise) appr
Kay,
Thank you for your explanation. The radiation damage was not the factor,
but there was something strange about this crystal (actually two
crystals had the same strange behavior). I could not process them in
HKL2000, but it showed the problem (see pictures in the attachment). The
processi
Maia,
provided radiation damage is not a major detrimental factor, your data
are just fine, and useful also in the high resolution shell (which still
has of 2.84 so you could probably process a bit beyond 2.25A).
There is nothing wrong with R_meas of 147.1% since, as others have said,
R_mea
Original Message
Subject:Re: [ccp4bb] I/sigmaI of >3.0 rule
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:43:23 -0700
From: Maia Cherney
To: Oganesyan, Vaheh
References: <2ba9ce2f-c299-4ca9-a36a-99065d1b3...@unipd.it>
<4d6faed8.7040...@ualberta.ca>
<021001cbd9bc$f0ecc940$d2c65
