: [ccp4bb] [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] High Rfree - ice ring
I agree with Harry that an ice ring should never require you to process the
data in two separate runs, and hopefully this does not become a standard
approach..
How did you present those data to aimless so it could scale the two
://www-ibmc.u-strasbg.fr/spip-arn/
En date de : Mar 9.4.19, Sam Tang a écrit :
Objet: Re: [ccp4bb] [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] High Rfree - ice ring
À: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Date: Mardi 9 avril 2019, 13h27
Hello again.
I
agree the get-around strategy
Hello again.
I agree the get-around strategy we took is not a good practice at all.
For our initial imosflm run we actually turned on 'exclude ice ring'
button. The following was reported in the log:
ICE RING SUMMARY:
reso ice_ring mean_I mean_Sigma Estimated_I Ratio Zscore Completeness
A
I agree with Harry that an ice ring should never require you to process the
data in two separate runs, and hopefully this does not become a standard
approach..
How did you present those data to aimless so it could scale the two
datasets that have no overlap at all?
Johan
On Tue, 9 Apr 20
There is an option in xds to exclude typical ice ring regions. It was
usually in the XDS.INP but commented out by default. That should work as it
should work with the ice ring button in mosflm.
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:07 AM Harry Powell <
193323b1e616-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail
Hi SamDid you use the ice-ring exclusion option in iMosflm (a button that has an image like a snowflake)? It should exclude data in _narrow_ resolution rings (substantially less than 0.2Å!) around the ice rings, and can be set for any combination of indexing, refinement and integration. There shoul
Hello everyone
Thanks a lot for your input and advices. To report on how we tackled the
issue -
(1) We used imosflm to integrate the data.
(2) We eventually integrated the data in two resolution ranges, say
45A-3.5A, and 3.3A-3A, and merge them by Aimless. I must add that indeed
from the log file
Dear all,
And if you want to process with XDS: autoPROC [1] will try to detect
and exclude ice-rings automatically - if present [2].
If you know that you have ice-rings you can force it [3] to exclude
all known ice-rings ranges - but this might not be the best solution
if you have "just" diffuse
Dear Sam,
to continue from James Parkhurst's email...
You can do more analysis regarding ice rings using Auspex
(https://www.auspex.de/) if you already have some integrated file.
Regarding re-integrating images, what did you use the first time round? I think
if you use DIALS it got some clev
