indication that the binding pose has
>> moved due to cleavage. That is the case for my compounds.
>>
>> Good luck!
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Sabini, Elisab
e!
It is a known REFMAC issue.
Tadeusz
"Sabini, Elisabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "CCP4 bulletin board"
29-Nov-2007 21:40
Please respond to "Sabini, Elisabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
cc
Subject
[ccp4bb] "Finding Chlor
.
Tadeusz
"Sabini, Elisabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "CCP4 bulletin board"
29-Nov-2007 21:40
Please respond to "Sabini, Elisabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
cc
Subject
[ccp4bb] "Finding Chlorine" =)
Dear all,
I
dn't show the Cl for #2, but I
> would show it for #1 if there is no indication that the binding pose has
> moved due to cleavage. That is the case for my compounds.
>
> Good luck!
> Thierry
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL P
Dear all,
I am refining two structures which have in the active site a ligand
containing a covalent bond between a carbon and a chlorine atom.
I collected the data at APS, SERCAT ID-22.
Because of radiation damage I tried different occupancy values for the
chlorine atom and structure number #1 i
