hello,
could i ask the developers to check for me that the rigid body refinement
module in the latest update works correctly. when i open the rigid body menu
i see no possibility to neither define my own domains nor select auto. rather i
see all kinds of options for auto map sharpening etc.
my
... and why don't we move on from pdb format to something a bit more
modern ?
i think it would only require a handful of programmers to agree on this
and the rest would (have to) follow.
i.e. if coot and refmac could both read and write something more modern
we'd have a huge part of ccp4 world
co
hello,
my poor dementia ridden brain has gone on screensaver ...
i need to calculate the completeness and redundancy of reflections in
batches or ranges of batches in a
multi-record .mtz file.
sftools can do this, but the numbers are pretty much meaningless, i.e.,
my feeling is, if i measure
10%
hello,
it seems i am recently getting the above error quite a lot in mapmask. i
have searched for a solution, but only found the problem mentioned a
few times with no precise solution indicated.
would there be a way to find out HOW MUCH memory mapmask is hoping for ?
i do have 2 Gb of memory and
not sure whether this option has been mentioned before ...
i think what we really would like to do is decide by the quality of the
density. i see that this is difficult.
so, short of that ... how about the figure of merit in refinement ?
wouldn't the fom reflect how useful our data really are ?
dear colleagues,
i convert xds_ascii.hkl with pointless to .mtz.
but recently (possibly since the latest xds release, not sure) scala
then exits my attempts to reduce the data :
Reflection rotation value outside range in Batch header
Reflection2 1 6 Isym =3 Batch 73
dear fellow ccp4ers,
while trying to run a translation function in amore, with a certain
crystal form we get the above error.
in a little more detail, what we get is this ...
centred-overlap
stop >> traft << no reflection selected
AMORE: Fatal error in s/r TRAFT
the required input files ar
hello,
i have succesfully installed 6.1.2 on ubuntu 8.04 using the automatic
installer. the one single correction i had to do was
change references from phaser 2.1.6 to phaser 2.1.4 in the setup
scripts. runs all fine.
now i tried the same with ubuntu 9.04 and get the following error
***
sorry ... user error ... input is case sensitive ... :-)
ingo
>it seems you have a version of coot in there, where the "get monomer"
>via 3-letter code is broken. alternatively "search monomer" does work,
>you can click on the molecule of choice and it gets nicely imported ...
>
>not sure whether
it seems you have a version of coot in there, where the "get monomer"
via 3-letter code is broken. alternatively "search monomer" does work,
you can click on the molecule of choice and it gets nicely imported ...
not sure whether there is a newer version that would work ...
cheers
ingo
--
CREL
I can confirm this: I see the following running times for the exact same
job under linux with no other work being done on the machine:
ccp4.6.1.1
Refmac_5.5.0072: End of Refmac_5.5.0072
Times: User: 176.1s System: 78.2s Elapsed: 4:15
ccp4.6.0.2
Refmac_5.4.0062: End of Refmac_5.4.
dear colleagues,
i just noticed a to me somewhat unexpected behaviour of pdbset.
as it turns out, it seems to make a difference whether i do run pdbset
all in one go, changing the cell and applying transformations at once:
pdbset XYZIN ... << eof-pdbset
cell
spacegroup ...
rotate euler
shif
submit your CV and a cover letter to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For further information, please visit us at www.crystax.com
--
Ingo P. Korndoerfer
CrystaX Pharmaceuticals, S.L.
Parc CientÃfic de Barcelona
Josep Samitier 1-5
08028 Barcelona
Tel.: +34 93 403 9093
Fax: +34 93 403 4788
e-mail: ipkcrystax.com
dear all ...
beyond iupac nomenclature ...
the remediated pdb sounds very nice, so i had a short look at the
formats they provide and found this:
mmcif, pdbxml, and pdb
and
http://biomol.dowling.edu/WPDB/
has a very nice discussion of advantages and disadvantages of the
various formats ...
dear colleagues,
after working around the topic for a while now or avoiding it
alltogether, it has now become time to ask:
could some friendly soul point me to a program that would create a .mol
or .sdf file from
1. a refmac dictionary file (to yield a .mol file randomly positioned
and oriented)
Senior Experimental Officer
>> Macromolecular Crystallography Core Facility
>> Faculty of Life Sciences
>> Michael Smith Building
>> The University of Manchester
>> Oxford Road
>> Manchester M13 9PT, UK
>> Phone: +44-161-275-5090/5658
>> Fax: +44-161
16 matches
Mail list logo