Hi Fred,
fine slicing does not alleviate the count RATE limitation of photon
counting detectors because fine slicing does not reduce the
instantaneous photon flux on the detector when you cross the diffraction
maximum. Fine slicing does help if you push the maximum counts per pixel
per frame
ith best wishes,
Gerard.
--
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:25:08PM -0500, Gerd Rosenbaum wrote:
Dear Gerard,
you sound like a sales person for Dectris. Fine slicing is perfectly fine
with CCD detectors - it takes a bit longer because of the step scan instead
of continuous scan. The read
Dear Gerard,
you sound like a sales person for Dectris. Fine slicing is perfectly
fine with CCD detectors - it takes a bit longer because of the step scan
instead of continuous scan. The read noise issue is often overstated
compared to the sample induced scatter background. If for fine slicing
Very good point, Eddie.
The exclusion of females starts already with the Program Committee.
Gerd Rosenbaum
On 25.11.2016 10:48, Edward Snell wrote:
This looks like a very interesting scientific meeting but I would
just like to point out an observation based on the current invited
speakers
Hi Clemens,
your suggested description of positive rotation doesn't remove the
ambiguity.
My intuitive way to define positive rotation (in 1994 or so, when
building the SBC) was:
Looking onto the sample, rotation of the sample in mathematically
positive direction
Only later I was told th
