-partir-de-01082024>)
and a research contingency fund, equivalent to 10% of the annual value of
the fellowship, allocated for research-related expenses.
*Ref: FAPESP Fellowship Opportunity 7194 (POR/EN)*: link 3
<https://fapesp.br/oportunidades/7194/>
Thank you, and enjoy your week.
--
A
N)*: link 3
<https://fapesp.br/oportunidades/metabolismo_no_microambiente_e_o_papel_das_trocas_metabolicas_na_progressao_tumoral/6788/>
Thank you, and enjoy your week.
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
Associate Professor, IFSC/USP - Bra
ar but only outputs
> centric reflections without additional labeling.
>
> Many thanks for your attention.
>
> --
> Andre LB Ambrosio
> Associate Professor, IFSC/USP - Brazil
> www.ifsc.usp.br/alba
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the C
thout additional labeling.
Many thanks for your attention.
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
Associate Professor, IFSC/USP - Brazil
www.ifsc.usp.br/alba
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.
details at https://fapesp.br/oportunidades/5522/en
or send inquiries to sandra.d...@lnbio.cnpem.br
Best wishes,
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
Associate Professor, IFSC/USP - Brazil
www.ifsc.usp.br/alba
To unsubscribe from the
Dear all,
I am trying to run a standalone version of the Ecalc program in a Google
Colab notebook linked to my Google Drive. The executable returns the
following error message:
/content/gdrive/Shareddrives/programs/ecalc: error while loading
shared libraries: libccp4f.so.8.0: cannot open shared ob
f ions, pH)?
>>
>> I want to observe the solvent effects on the conformational space around
>> a starting model, all-atom, while preserving its geometry (I guess it can
>> be better expressed as relaxation).
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>> --
>
, while preserving its geometry (I guess it can be
better expressed as relaxation).
Thank you in advance.
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi
e map will also
> reverse the image of the structure which may not be what you want. In that
> case Eleanor's solution which results in only reversing the image of the
> map is probably the right one.
>
> Oh and happy April 1st to all!
>
> Cheers
>
> -- Ian
>
Dear all,
is it possible to generate a mirror image of an existing .ccp4 map file?
Many thanks in advance.
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi
ommend this one:
>
> https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767386099622
>
> and Main, P. (1979) Acta Cryst. A35, 779-85 - the maths in this one are a
> bit easier!
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 2 October 2019, 22:47:56 BST, Andre LB Ambrosio <
> an...@ifsc.usp.br> wrote:
>
>
Dear all,
How is the phase error estimated for any given reflection, specifically in
the context of model refinement? In terms of math I mean.
How useful is FOM in assessing the phase quality, when not for initial
experimental phases?
Many thank in advance,
Andre.
#
ues,
>> > >
>> > > Can a CCP4 program calculate r_work and r_free directly from a .mtz
>> > > file containing FP and FC_ALL (from PDB_REDO)? this without inputing
>> > > the matching .pdb file and ideally using a commando line.
>> > >
>> >
Dear colleagues,
Can a CCP4 program calculate r_work and r_free directly from a .mtz file
containing FP and FC_ALL (from PDB_REDO)? this without inputing the
matching .pdb file and ideally using a commando line.
Many thanks in advance,
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
pe it exemplifies enough
> for you to pick up from there and modify it the way you wish. The only test
> I did is I made sure it runs and outputs and MTZ file!
>
> Good luck,
> Pavel
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 3:20 PM Andre LB Ambrosio
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
&
s in the bulk solvent. Add up all the atomic numbers in
> your PDB file (including hydrogen) and you have the rest of the electrons
> in your unit cell. The sum of all electrons in one unit cell is F000.
>
> HTH
>
> -James Holton
> MAD Scientist
>
> On 5/15/2019 5:52 AM,
> together the number of electrons for all the atoms refined in the
>> asymmetric unit (protein + ligands + solvent)?
>>
>
> See my previous email.
>
> Pavel
>
>
--
Andre LB Ambrosio
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
At the title, please read Unitary, not Unit. Apologies.
Em qua, 15 de mai de 2019 às 09:09, Andre LB Ambrosio
escreveu:
> Dear all,
>
> We seek to calculate the distribution of Unitary Structure Factors, Uhkl,
> from a few datasets (at different maximum resolutions) f
) be best estimated from the final model, which is not
necessarily always the most complete or best refined? Should we simply add
together the number of electrons for all the atoms refined in the
asymmetric unit (protein + ligands + solvent)?
Many thanks in advance and best wishes,
--
Andre LB
19 matches
Mail list logo