Well, I was reflecting on James's reminder of the huge precision gain
from inclusion of restraints; that's formally an information gain, so
should we not be casting that as "effective resolution" or some-such.
But this is where you get to ignore me if I am in fact committing
techno-waffle.
F
A couple seats have become available. If you're in the U.S., particularly an
existing APS user, and are interested in attending, please get in touch with us.
Charles, Andrey, Garib and Qingping
Subject: 16th Annual CCP4/APS Crystallographic School (2024) in the
Dear Charles,
Thanks for the kind words, and thanks for the links to your papers! I hadn’t
run across them before — they look very interesting and relevant, but it will
take a bit of time to digest them!
Randy
> On 9 Oct 2024, at 21:36, Sindelar, Charles wrote:
>
> Randy, what a beautiful pa
Dear all,
Good news! We have some budget to sponsor up to £100 transport and 1 night
hotel (Wednesday 6th November) for PhD students (not local to Newcastle/Durham)
who give a talk/poster. Please note these bursaries are limited so will be
awarded on a first-come-first-serve basis. PhD students
Hi Frank,
How are you proposing that this could be used? I like to think (from a Bayesian
perspective) that if you’re handling the restraints properly (i.e. in a way
where they reflect the prior probability of the model), then they automatically
balance themselves with the data likelihood. If t
Hi,
Ian makes a good case that “resolution” already has a useful definition. I
would hesitate to take any single number, including the half-bit-per-reflection
criterion, as a measure of diffraction limit, because there’s useful
information beyond that point especially crystals that diffract
an
