Hi John,
good idea in principle, but the amount of incompatible code changes between
versions is surprisingly large.
On top of that, XDS philosophy has always been that there is a single "best"
algorithm (which may be fine-tuned in subsequent releases).
The main arguments for that are:
- it is
Dear all
I have a question about the 3D classification of a membrane protein using
Relion 3.1, where I aim to remove some junk particles. The protein is
relatively small (180 kDa), and its structure has already been resolved by
cryoEM. It has minimal features outside the micelle ring and is primar
Hi Kay, thank you so much for the explanation, this is very helpful. Maybe
it is already possible, but perhaps the user could select whether to do the
background estimation using either the old or new way (with or without
local fitting), via the XDS.INP file?
Thanks again,
John
On Sat, Oct 5, 202
Hello,
I would like to take this opportunity to announce the release of our new
web-tool, FoldScript (https://foldscript.ibcp.fr/), which complements
our web-tool ESPript.
FoldScript allows to analyze and to filter with experimental results (ie
residues known to be involved in intermolecular in
Dear John,
version 202406030 of XDS estimates the background "under" a reflection in a
different way than 20230630 and earlier.
The new way uses a background template based on the background image
constructed in the INIT step of XDS, whereas in the old way that was only used
for calculating a s
Dear Jon
I did the same for a dimer of a structure we just solved but only now writing
the paper. AF3 predicted the monomer to an RMS of about 0.3 and dimer to about
0.5 Angstroms
Structure not yet in the PDB, but soon
Joel
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2024, at 17:35, Jurgen Bosch
I used it for PPI prediction of a mAb and our target protein and it was
surprisingly accurate compared to our crystal structure. Binding of the mAb
was <0.5 rmsd I was stunned.
Jürgen
P.S. paper should be accepted soon, but you’ll find a current version on
BioRxiv if you are interested. AF3 is not
Just wondering if anyone has any comments on, or concrete experiences with,
alphafold3. I might try to cobble something together for Crystallography News
(he says, having missed the main Nature paper, ahem). My googling has only
given me hype and gripe so far ;-0 ;-0
Best wishes, Jon Cooper.
jo
Dear Kay, do have any more information or would you mind explaining a bit more
what changes in the XDS code led to these significantly different statistics in
the different XDS versions?
Thanks,John
On Wednesday, October 2, 2024 at 02:35:25 PM CDT, Kay Diederichs
wrote:
Dear Yimin,