Re: [ccp4bb] (IUCr) The evolution of raw data archiving and the growth of its importance in crystallography

2024-06-15 Thread Wladek Minor
James, This is correct. To my knowledge, the only  result of BD2K initiative which is still alive (barely) is proteindiffraction.org.  I know that PDBj is planning to pick-up the data but they do not have funds to keep the entire system alive, i.e. check of netadata, processing, doi handlig,

Re: [ccp4bb] (IUCr) The evolution of raw data archiving and the growth of its importance in crystallography

2024-06-15 Thread Wladek Minor
Dear Martin, I am the one who presented in Melbourne. When you contact support, please send cc to wla...@minorlab.org. Just for your information, proteindiffraction.org is not supported by NIH since 2018. Best regards Wladek On 6/14/2024 1:55 PM, Martin Malý wrote: Dear John, Please could

Re: [ccp4bb] Comparing datasets with different resolution/quality

2024-06-15 Thread Jon Cooper
Comparing maps sounds just like the sort of thing the Uppsala suite did. Maybe you can find an old binary for mapman or mapman2(?) or compile it from Martin Winn's github page. The closest I can find is EDSTATS which I think is in the old ccp4 gui. Best wishes, Jon Cooper. jon.b.coo...@protonma

Re: [ccp4bb] (IUCr) The evolution of raw data archiving and the growth of its importance in crystallography

2024-06-15 Thread John R Helliwell
Hello James,I have checked the IUCr Public Forum Diffraction Data Deposition Working Group postings and there is no posting about an ROI for the IRRMC. I don’t recall mention of it being made on this bb either, but my memory may be wrong.Answering ROIs are important, as you are correctly stressing