[ccp4bb] PDRA position in antiviral drug discovery at Diamond Light Source

2024-03-04 Thread Fearon, Daren (DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI)
Dear all, We are currently recruiting for a Post-Doctoral Research Associate within the XChem/I04-1 team at Diamond Light Source to drive high-throughput fragment screening experiments and structural biology support for hit-to-lead development as part of our NIH-funded Anti-Viral Drug Discovery

Re: [ccp4bb] i2run crank2 problem

2024-03-04 Thread zx2...@connect.hku.hk
Dear Stuart, Thank you very much for your prompt and helpful response. I apologize for my delayed reply. Your guidance offered a solid foundation, enabling me to successfully implement the procedures you suggested. However, I've encountered additional challenges that were not resolved. Specific

Re: [ccp4bb] mixture

2024-03-04 Thread Tim Gruene
Dear Marius, it looks like you didn't receive an answer, yet. It would be easy in SHELXL. You may convert the PDB file to the starting instruction filewith PDB2INS. Fixing any parameter is done by adding 10 to it, i.e. you can simply run awk on the ins-file to fix x,y,z and Uiso for structure 1,

Re: [ccp4bb] Rwork and Rfree the same?

2024-03-04 Thread Gerard Bricogne
Dear Justin, Would it be possible for you to send off-list the report_staraniso.pdf file created by your autoPROC job (or the job number of your STARANISO submission if you used the server) so that we can examine the pattern of data incompleteness indicated by the plots? This would be

Re: [ccp4bb] RES: [ccp4bb] Rwork and Rfree the same?

2024-03-04 Thread Eleanor Dodson
That is extremely likely! - certainly REFMAC will do that.. If 5% missing using DFcalc is a good thing - if 35% is missing not wise.. Eleanor On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 07:53, Ben Bax wrote: > > Fcalc maps look fantastic. Are you sure they were not using an Fcalc for > the missing 35% of the data? >