Re: [ccp4bb] Post Doc position at ESRF ID29

2021-04-02 Thread Vatsal Purohit
My apologies – didn’t mean to send this to the whole list. -Vatsal PhD Candidate, Stauffacher Lab, Dept. of Biology, Purdue University PULSe-Biophysics and Structural Biology training group vpur...@purdue.edu | 346-719-9409 From: Vatsal Purohit

Re: [ccp4bb] Post Doc position at ESRF ID29

2021-04-02 Thread Vatsal Purohit
Hi Dr. Sanctis, I am interested in applying for this position and wanted to ask you if it would be possible for me to attach the contact information of the references in my application instead of attaching the letters themselves. It would be to their preference to be contacted and share their l

[ccp4bb] Poster submission 4th ERNEST GPCR meeting open till 7th April

2021-04-02 Thread Schertler Gebhard (PSI)
Poster submission 4th ERNEST GPCR meeting open till 7th April https://ernestcostaction.wixsite.com/website/poster-flash-talks https://ernestcostaction.wixsite.com/website Prof. Gebhard F.X. Schertler Structural Biology ETH Zürich D-BIOL Head of Biology and Chemistry Division Paul Scherrer Inst

[ccp4bb] Job Ad: cryoEM microscopist position available - SEMC, NYSBC, NYC, USA

2021-04-02 Thread Ed Eng
Ready to make cryoEM your profession? Do you find operating a Krios everyday fun? Enjoy helping users learn about cryoEM? Want to work in NYC with a rich and diverse scientific community? Then join the SEMC operations team, which supports the scientific instruments at our “center of centers” to

Re: [ccp4bb] High Rs

2021-04-02 Thread Eugene Osipov
Hi Sam, some time ago I had a similar issue: refinement for a soaked crystal stuck at 0.36/0.41 and there was no ligand density. I tried to reprocess my dataset using different start/end frames and one of the processing runs gave me a unit cell with a doubled axis a. Refinement against this dataset

Re: [ccp4bb] High Rs

2021-04-02 Thread Sam Tang
Dear all Thanks a lot for the numerous input. Will try the different strategies and get back again soon. BRs Sam On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:28, Sam Tang wrote: > Dear all > > I have a dataset processed to 2.2 A, P212121, with no major issues > identified by Xtriage (no tNCS, no twinning, no ic