Dear Jasmine,
Thank you for contributing to this thread.
This has been asked in a different way, but can we simply assume at this
point that the mmCIF/PDB records will no longer contain any or separate
chain ID-like item that reflects chains including proteins and their
glycans, as has been t
Dear ccp4bb enthusiasts,
I have a postdoc position available in my lab. We are a small and collaborative
lab and are looking for someone enthusiastic to join our efforts. Multiple
projects in different stages of development are available.
Previous experience with structural biology would be a pl
Dear Marcin,
The cif item, _pdbx_branch_scheme.pdb_asym_id, in the pdbx_branch_scheme
category is a pointer to _atom_site.auth_asym_id in the atom_site
category (I know this is confusing). The labels are consistently defined
as the ones in _pdbx_poly_seq_scheme and _pdbx_nonpoly_scheme.
To u
The National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) is seeking a scientific
software developer to join the Scientific Computing & Data Acquisition, Data
Management, Data Analysis Group. This position is needed to support the
development and maintenance of a software infrastructure for data acquis
On 12/10/2020 6:46 AM, Schreuder, Herman /DE wrote:
Dear Phil,
0.32 is awfully close to 1/3, which brings a nice mathematical puzzle to my
mind to see if the 1/3 occupancy is somehow related to the 3 fully occupied
monomers... It may also be related to a (trigonal??) space group...
You proba
Hi Phil,
It’s always a difficult balance between looking hard in a difficult case and
possibly finding an answer with a weak signal, and stopping when the search is
really unlikely to succeed. Phaser perhaps errs too much toward trying really
hard.
There’s one really blunt tool in Phaser, the
Thanks for the suggestions.
The idea that it's related to a trigonal space group and twinning or
pseudo space group is an interesting one, but this is C2221 and the
intensity stats don't show twinning. Twinned P21 -> C2221 doesn't solve
the non-unit occupancy in this case. Since the other mo
Dear Phil,
0.32 is awfully close to 1/3, which brings a nice mathematical puzzle to my
mind to see if the 1/3 occupancy is somehow related to the 3 fully occupied
monomers... It may also be related to a (trigonal??) space group...
You probably have already tried it, but phaser has the option to
Dear Phil,
What is the space group? Could it be that the 4th monomer makes also a trimer
by symmetry, in an alternative SG?
A.
> On 10 Dec 2020, at 14:49, Phil Jeffrey wrote:
>
> Preamble:
> I have an interesting crystal form with 3 monomers (~400aa) at full occupancy
> and apparently one a
Preamble:
I have an interesting crystal form with 3 monomers (~400aa) at full
occupancy and apparently one at much reduced occupancy. It was built
recently from Se-SAD and was in moderately good condition: Rfree=32% for
trimer, 2.6 Å. In recent refinement cycles it became obvious that there
Thanks Tim and Oleg for suggestions.
The legacy version works and should be sufficient for my purpose.
Maybe there could be a link or hint in the chapter "Old AMD
processors" to avoid unnecessary questions.
Greetings
Gottfried
On Thursday, 10-12-2020 at 12:46 Kovalevskiy, Oleg (STFC,RAL,SC
Dear Gottfried,
If this is 64-bit AMD, there is legacy build of CCP4 for Linux available for
download at the bottom of this page (under ‘Legacy systems’):
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/download/#os=linux
Hope this helps.
All the best,
Oleg
--
Dr Oleg Kovalevskiy
CCP4 Core team
UKRI Scie
Dear Gottfried,
you can compile from source, http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/download/#os=src
and/or spend 150-200Euro for a new computer.
Best,
Tim
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:07:17 +0100
"Palm, Gottfried" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am running into a "known issue" upon installing ccp4-7.1 on a
> pre2010
Dear all,
I am running into a "known issue" upon installing ccp4-7.1 on a
pre2010 AMD machine. The download page says
CCP4 7.1: Known issues
...
Old AMD processors
...
We are in the process of preparing an alternative release package for
those processors.
Is there a solution in the meanw
Dear all,
together with Brian Jiménez-García (Utrecht University) and Masahito Ohue
(Tokyo Institute of Technology), we are editing a Research Topic entitled "Web
Tools for Modeling and Analysis of Biomolecular Interactions" for the journal
"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences".
Full details
Several people have mentioned lack of peer review as a reason to doubt the
significance of the AlphaFold2 results. There are different routes to peer
review and, while the results have not been published in a peer review journal,
I would have to say (as someone who has been an assessor for two
16 matches
Mail list logo