On 2020-10-09 01:59, Dirk Kostrewa wrote:
Dear Doo Nam Kim,
On 09.10.20 08:43, Doo Nam Kim wrote:
Since I don't know correct value of OSCILLATION_RANGE, I just changed
to the example value (0.1) from (0.89976, I know it is not a
positive multiple of 0.0001, but worked for ketone data).
w
Hi Doo Nam Kim,
If you do not know your OSCILLATION_RANGE, a good guess would be to take
your collection angle range (-60 to +60 or 120 degrees) and divide that by
the number of frames.
Best,
Jessica
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:00 AM Dirk Kostrewa <
dirk.kostr...@lrz.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
> Dear
Dear all,
Please note there is one week left to apply for this year's DLS/CCP4
workshop (details below).
Best wishes
-- David
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 10:03, David Waterman wrote:
> We are pleased to announce that the 7th joint Diamond-CCP4 Workshop on
> MX data collection and structure solution
What is the best way to display Harker sections these days?
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
This message was issued to members
Dear Doo Nam Kim,
On 09.10.20 08:43, Doo Nam Kim wrote:
Since I don't know correct value of OSCILLATION_RANGE, I just changed to the
example value (0.1) from (0.89976, I know it is not a positive multiple of
0.0001, but worked for ketone data).
without knowing the correct value for the O
Scientist X-ray Crystallography at ZoBio in Leiden (NL)
ZoBio (www.zobio.com) was founded in 2004 and is located in Leiden, Netherlands. We offer innovative research services in the field of small-molecule drug discovery to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Our i
Dear Doo Nam Kim,
actually the results of XDS processing are deterministic for all practical
purposes (to be nitpicking, the multi-processor version xds_par may result in
slighly different output each time it is run, because for a few calculations
the order of operations is influenced by the o
