Dear Randy
Yes this makes sense.
Certainly cut offs are bad – I hope I my post wasn’t implying one should cut
off the data at some particular resolution shell. Some reflections in a shell
will be weak and some stronger. Knowing which are which is of course
information.
I will have a look at the
Dear Colin,
Over the last few years we've been implementing measures of information gain to
evaluate X-ray diffraction data in our program Phaser. Some results in a paper
that has been accepted for publication in the 2019 CCP4 Study Weekend special
issue are relevant to this discussion.
First,
Dear Colleagues,
If you are looking for a Post-Doc position in place where you don’t have to
wait for weeks to measure on a TITAN KRIOS equipped with a direct detector
and phase plate, then please consider the position that I have currently
available in my group for an EM-savvy structural biolog
Dear all,
*** Reminder - please note registration closes tomorrow - Friday 21st Feb ***
We are pleased to announce our annual 'Icknield Model Building Workshop' will
take place 16-20 March at RAL/Diamond Light Source, Oxfordshire, UK
This is a comprehensive course for EM model building covering
Dear all,
I have received a request to clarify what I mean by threshold in my
contribution of 17 Feb below and then post the clarification on CCP4BB. Being
a loyal (but very sporadic) CCP4BBer I am now doing this. My musings in this
thread are as much auto-didactic as didactic. In other words I
Dear all,
Two more days left for CCP-EM Spring Symposium early bird registration.
Last day for early bird registration is tomorrow - Friday, 21st February.
After that the registration fee will increase!
Full details are available here:
http://www.cvent.com/d/8hqsdb
CCP-EM are proud to announ
Hi Gloria,
While we're confessing to minor economies with the truth, I never travelled to
the Photon Factory in Japan with crystals of pertussis toxin: they were
crystals of Bordetella pertussis ADP-ribosyltransferase.
Randy
> On 20 Feb 2020, at 02:47, Gloria Borgstahl wrote:
>
> Actually we
