Good evening,
Over the years I've seen great diffraction from any number of hideous
brittle plates with perforated edges, 'Krypton skyscrapers', curved
whiskers, 'hypodermic needles', even from crystals that looked like cat
vomit (hairballs), and so forth.
The structure *ab ovo* story is my favor
Hi Anirban,
Never thought someone will ask for image of 'ugly' crystals, but
fortunately I have found some saved pictures which is more than 8 years old!
I think I have a perfect example. The pictures can be found in the folder
by following the link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B1M5Wq4
The one I don't get is why not pay reviewers? $1000 per review? If you look at
publishers' profit margins, you will see that they can afford it. I actually
think the scientific community should go on a "review strike" until reviewers
get paid.
JPK
++
Indeed! Scientists in the Soviet Bloc got paid for publishing their scientific
papers (and maybe for citations as well - not sure about that one)! We need to
change the current system! Although these changes could be accompanied by many
other pleasant virtues of the Soviet regime.
Petr
> On
whose paper? our universities pay subscriptions for these journals and we even
pay on top of that for the pages of our publications (even when they're not
actually printed!), whilst we review papers for free! sounds like a
well-validated way to use taxpayers' money to keep the expensive company
Dear all,
We have two open PhD positions in my lab at RWTH Aachen University.
Please find the two job advertisements at:
https://web-p.zhv.rwth-aachen.de/mainzhv.php?scriptid=job¶m=vorschau&nr=23666&typ=engl
https://web-p.zhv.rwth-aachen.de/mainzhv.php?scriptid=job¶m=vorschau&nr=23667&typ=engl
Yes, but think of all the money they miss due to your pirating of their paper
;) It's the typical discussion about whether piracy of copyrighted material
leads to loss or gain of revenue. There are a lot of models here, but not
necessarily well-validated.
Anyway, if people want to read your pap
The wwPDB OneDep system for deposition, validation and biocuration will
require contact authors to provide their unique ORCID identifiers
(https://orcid.org/) when preparing depositions later this summer. This
change will enable wwPDB efforts to correctly attribute PDB structures to
contact authors
Agreed, but for 10 years old papers this seems a bit of overkill..
From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Robbie
Joosten
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 12:11
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Were they open access papers? If they were, than OUP is being t
Were they open access papers? If they were, than OUP is being too aggressive
(IMO), but otherwise it makes sense. I also find the ResearchGate is rather
aggressive in bugging you to upload papers that are readily available from the
publisher. The whole business bit in scientific publishing is a
Hi Fellows,
just an advisory that Oxford University Press is pretty aggressive in
enforcing copyright - I had to remove 2 Bioinformatics papers
from ResearchGate.
Fortunately, authors have choices, too..
Cheers, BR
--
Bernhard Rupp
Dear all,
Hoping to please you, I inform you that submissions of contributions for
a special issue of "Crystals" (IF 2.144) dedicated to crystallization in
gels are welcome. Manuscripts can be related to theoretical and/or
experimental aspects of crystallization in gel media. High-quality work
12 matches
Mail list logo
