Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Patrick Shaw Stewart
There are some interesting anti-patent initiatives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent#Anti-patent_initiatives including prizes as an alternative to patents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prizes_as_an_alternative_to_patents#Other_areas_for_prize_models_over_patents On 4 November 2017 at 15:0

Re: [ccp4bb] software to map surface residues

2017-11-04 Thread Tim Gruene
Dear Kai, the output of the CCP4 program 'surface' lists the "accessible area of atom". Without trying I'd extract those residues with a non-zero entry there. Regards, Tim On Friday, November 3, 2017 8:59:03 AM CET Kai Zhou wrote: > Hello, is there an existing program that can extract the 3D coo

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Bernhard Rupp
> to publish it so the world can benefit from it. Isn’t that exactly the idea of a patent? Instead of keeping the invention a trade secret (occasionally a viable alternative) you publish the invention, and the inventor (and in general, the supporting institutions) can get rewarded if someone

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Abhishek Anan
I second Gert's thoughts Best, Abhishek On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Gert Vriend wrote: > A related question. If you have a crystal structure and found a novel >> ligand binding site that can be used to regulate protein activity, could >> you patent such "binding site"? If not, how to m

[ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Gert Vriend
A related question. If you have a crystal structure and found a novel ligand binding site that can be used to regulate protein activity, could you patent such "binding site"? If not, how to make the best use of such findings? I would say that the best one can do with important novel data/info