Maybe, but it may also indicate that the problem isn’t twinning, but simply
pseudo symmetry.
Zanuda is one way to double-check, and it takes approximately a day to
re-process the data, run the MR and run Zanuda.
Diana
**
Diana R. Tomchick
Profess
That seems hard work to me! Data quality suffers when you discard
multiplicity..
Eleanor
On 8 August 2017 at 17:15, Sudipta Bhattacharyya <
sudiptabhattacharyya.iit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Giorgio,
>
> I also suspect the presence of twining and as Eleanor has suggested the L
> test is the best
You have some horrible ice rings - some data processing software may be
able to cut them out.. how are you processing it?
Eleanor
On 8 August 2017 at 15:43, Christian Roth
wrote:
> Your plots look strangely different to the old Scala output you posted
> before, but never mind.
>
> Paul is right
A postdoctoral position is available immediately to participate in an
inter-disciplinary research program on structural immunology at the Institute
of Human Virology of School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Candidates are expected to work on ongoing research projects in stru
Hi Giorgio,
I also suspect the presence of twining and as Eleanor has suggested the L
test is the best test to detect that (if also t-NCS is not present). You
can reprocess your data in P1, do MR in P1 and then feed your P1 model and
mtz file to zanuda to see what SG it suggests. That trick once w
Your plots look strangely different to the old Scala output you posted
before, but never mind.
Paul is right that a negative intensity is not desired and your crystal
has some issues with ice.
That one icering around 2.26 must be massive taken into account how
haywire your curve goes there.
On 08/08/2017 15:07, Satvik Kumar wrote:
Dear Prof. Powell and Prof. Dodson,
Thanks for your reply and advise.
As per your suggestion, I have re-scaled the intensities using Aimless at 1.861
A.
I observe that the I/sigI has dropped to -0.8
That's not good.
> and the behaviour of CC_1/2 is
First of all - check whether your crystal data shows twinning - thee is an
L-test plot which usually gives a clear indication and if you are using
GUI2 the report suggests if this is so.
If you have twinning the most likely SG is P31 (or P32 ) - you cant tell
the difference till the structure is
Hello everybody,
I think I have a pseudo-centering problem.
I have a 1.6 ang. dataset of a mutant protein that is an homodimer in solution.
Data processing gives the following SG:
Space group: P 31 2 1
Average unit cell: 111.36 111.36 28.56 90.00 90.00 120.00
Average mosaicity: 0.24
