Yes. With the caveat that ISYM refers to the symmetry operators in the order
they are stored in the MTZ file
Phil
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 Jun 2017, at 17:04, wtempel wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Are the following statements regarding AIMLESS unmerged mtz output accurate?
> - the H, K, L, M/
I believe so!
Eleanor
On 22 June 2017 at 17:04, wtempel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Are the following statements regarding AIMLESS unmerged mtz output
> accurate?
> - the H, K, L, M/ISYM columns are sufficient to recover the "original" H K
> L indices.
> - a combination of "original" H K L and the B
A postdoctoral position is available immediately in the laboratory of Dr.
Emilia Galperin in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry in the
College of Medicine at the University of Kentucky to work on externally funded,
multi-year projects. The overall goal of the lab is to underst
Yes, the hinge region between Fab and Fc is highly flexible. If you look at
IgG by EM you will see many different conformations. Best to use Fab or
scFv.
Jarrod Mousa
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Cheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a naive question about antibodies. Many people used Fab
I have only heard of a few cases of successful Se incorporation into
Cys, and none of them sounded like fun. Sounds like you have gotten a
few suggestions already. There is not much literature on this.
As for alternative solutions to your original question, I can tell you
the success or fai
The fact that the PDB holds hundreds of FABs and a handful whole ABs
suggests to me that the latter are hard to get crystals for. So, all the
more reason for us bioinformaticians that you, experimentalists try it :-)
Gert
On 22-6-2017 20:39, Cheng Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
I have a naive questi
Hi all,
I have a naive question about antibodies. Many people used Fab fragments in
crystallization. I am wondering if it is possible to use the whole IgG
molecule with Fc fragment as well. Or it would be too flexible and bad for
crystallization?
Thanks,
Cheng
--
-
Cheng Z
A postdoctoral or technician position is immediately available in the
Structural Biology of Noncoding RNAs and Ribonucleoproteins Section, Laboratory
of Molecular Biology (LMB), NIDDK, in NIH’s vibrant main campus in Bethesda, MD
near Washington DC. The lab addresses a widening gap between the a
Dear Gerard,
I was puzzled by the statement that the UCLA anisotropy server characterises
anisotropy in terms of a combination of effects restricted to lie along the
crystallographic axes. That server is built on the anisotropy correction
algorithm in Phaser, and from the beginning Phaser has
Dear Vito
AMPLE is another option to easily and automatically find conserved cores
among a set of distant homologues. You point it to a directory
containing your homologues and use the
-homologs True
flag. You can use the command line or CCP4i. It will then use GESAMT to
find the multiple s
Dear all,
Announcing in the mailing list for crystallography and in the era of the single
particles EM resolution revolution, a course for solution methods?
NMR, SAXS, calorimetry, fluorescent methods and modeling? Seriously?
Well, yes! For many, many reasons, you should be at least curious, an
Hello all,
Are the following statements regarding AIMLESS unmerged mtz output accurate?
- the H, K, L, M/ISYM columns are sufficient to recover the "original" H K
L indices.
- a combination of "original" H K L and the BATCH value is unique inside
the file.
Thank you in advance.
Wolfram Tempel
Yes, I agree that MR is worth a shot, though depending on the resolution your
life may be vastly easier with experimental phases! We've had several cases
where the following kind of procedure works: find related structures with a
very sensitive homology search (we like HHPRED, though other opti
We have successfully used non-auxotrophic strains for incorporation of SeMet
and SeCys, with an incorporation level of >80% and no effects on yield or
solubility. Details can be found here:
http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0907444910042022
It's a straight-forward protocol and structure
Hi Megha,
my explanation would be that you have a 2:2 complex. Meaning in your
standard assay, you need 2 peptides as dimer to get a dimer of your protein.
Now that you do the competition assay, you probably start with
concentrations, where this 2:2 complex is not saturated yet. Meaning
that
Dear Megha,
I am puzzled by the results you presented. If you only see the effect in the
presence of your protein, the protein must have something to do with it. The
steep decline points to some highly cooperative effect, which might be
aggregation/precipitation. Did you check that your protein
16 matches
Mail list logo