I guess it was a problem with the directories name. (Changed the locale
when downloading... Did it all over again and it works).
2017-05-09 16:21 GMT-05:00 Murpholino Peligro :
> The installation process remains here
> ...(attached image)
>
> Is it doing something?
> Is there a way to solve this
Dear Board Readers,
For anyone who might be interested, or know of interested persons, there is a
postdoctoral position available at CSIRO:
https://career10.successfactors.com/sfcareer/jobreqcareer?jobId=39270&company=CSIRO&username
Best regards, tom
Postdoctoral position in membrane protein structural biology
The laboratory of David Drew at Stockholm University is seeking an enthusiastic
postdoc with an interest in elucidating molecular mechanisms of brain transport
proteins using biochemical and biophysical approaches. We use diverse
tec
A postdoctoral position is available at Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia,
PA) for a highly motivated individual in the field of protein biochemistry,
cell signaling, or structural biology.
The lab aims to understand the molecular basis for the cell signaling events
that affect cell motilit
Actually this is taken care of in the BIOMOLECULE definition.
If the artist had used the principle biomolecule, it excludes the Fv fragments.
On 05/09/2017 01:08 PM, Edward A. Berry wrote:
In line with this, there are a number of pictures in the literature of the
mitochondrial
electron transpor
**
*
*
*Staff scientist position*is available in the research group of Kristina
Djinovic-Carugo in the Department for Structural and Computational
Biology, Max. F. Perutz Laboratories at the University of Vienna,
Austria. The main area of the group research is structural biology of
F-actin
In line with this, there are a number of pictures in the literature of the
mitochondrial
electron transport chain, with the complexes lined up in a row embedded in a
membrane,
and with yeast complex III still having the Fv fragments it was crystallized
with, attached.
Only obvious if you are f
A slightly different wrinkle on the perennial "do we model unresolved
sidechains" debate, I guess. I would argue that in the case of mutations, tags
etc. those are things you know were there before you started firing x-rays at
your sample. In the case of the sidechain decarboxylation we know it'
Hi Tristan
I'm not so sure. The co-ordinates are the result of the experiment. How
other people choose to interpret those results is their affair. Taking it
to its logical conclusion suppose that we 'damage' the protein by
mutating/deleting some residues or adding tags purely for the purpose of
Hmm... this is a bit of a philosophical pickle in my mind.
I agree.
Right now I want as accurate a model as possible to improve the phases for
interpretation of a few remaining bits. I haven't decided what to deposit-
maybe three separate structures:
1. Conservatively modeled: Everything that
I would think the first goal is to model the observed data correctly, and then
afterwards an accurate "before" model could be inferred.
It seems that it would be extremely helpful to this end to add another column
to the .pdb format: a "time constant" for radiation damage for each atom. When
se
Hmm... this is a bit of a philosophical pickle in my mind. Do we want to
model the structure as what it looks like after radiation damage has had
its way with it, or what it must have looked like *before* the damage? I
can see arguments both ways (and can sympathise with the former if you
want
On 05/09/2017 06:18 AM, Ian Tickle wrote:
We have seen almost identical density to Ed's for GLU side-chains, with what looks like a linear molecule (yes
exactly the size of CO2!) where the carboxylate group would be and absolutely no density for the CG-CD bond. So
it's indeed very tempting to
Dear H.Sin,
These references may help you:
Meireles, M., Aimar, P., and Sanchez, V. (2004) Albumin denaturation during
ultrafiltration: effects of operating conditions and consequences on membrane
fouling, Biotech. Bioeng. 38, 528-534.
Schratter, P., (2004) Purification and concentration by ult
Hi Jacob
On 9 May 2017 at 14:03, Keller, Jacob wrote:
> Wouldn’t the not-bonded CO2 have a new steric clash with the CG, though?
>
I think the CG can easily swing out of the way, since it's now only
attached to the CB.
> And what happened to the radical that was presumably generated?
>
Good
Wouldn’t the not-bonded CO2 have a new steric clash with the CG, though? And
what happened to the radical that was presumably generated?
Also, I would think solvent-exposed side chains would be more prone to
diffusion than buried ones.
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.U
Job Advertisement:
Immunocore LTD are looking to recruit for the newly formed Crystallography
Group. You will be part of a small research team that aims to improve our
understanding of T Cell Receptor (TCR) structure function relationships to
enhance our understanding and development of ou
Hello everyone!
I want to prepare heavy atom stock solution to soaking my crystal, what
should i use to soluble the heavy atom Pt, Hg and other hampton heavy atom
screen kits, as i know someone not good soluble in water?
can anyone give me some ideas!
sincerely
Liuqing chen
Dear all,
as usual the bulletin board nails it.
The paper I was vaguely remembering was indeed the following:
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005 May;61(Pt 5):646-50
Crystallization of foot-and-mouth disease virus 3C protease: surface
mutagenesis and a novel crystal-optimization strategy.
Hi Andrew
We have seen almost identical density to Ed's for GLU side-chains, with
what looks like a linear molecule (yes exactly the size of CO2!) where the
carboxylate group would be and absolutely no density for the CG-CD bond.
So it's indeed very tempting to say that the CO2 is still there, and
You can do this in the data reduction task in ccp4i2, which runs Pointless,
Aimless and Ctruncate
Phil
> On 7 May 2017, at 23:10, Careina Edgooms
> <02531c126adf-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have not been in the game of solving structures for years. In the past I
> us
Just to confirm what Eleanor said: all SHELX programs prefer to be given
intensities but can accept F if the intensities have been lost.
Converting intensities to F (e.g. with ctruncate) and back again
degrades the statistics for the weak reflections and is discouraged. The
same applies to PHAS
22 matches
Mail list logo
