Dear All,
Just before IUCr main congress there is going to be a Crystallographic
Computing School. It will take place on 15th-20th of August 2017 in Bangalore.
It promises to be very exciting school with lectures from various experts in
Crystallography and some tutorials and with a lot of discu
Sorry Ian, I was attributing this to Kevin
apologies
Phil
> On 12 Mar 2017, at 21:56, Ian Tickle wrote:
>
>
> Eleanor,
>
> Phil is right about the bias of the weighted mean, here's how I do it using a
> minimum mean-squared error estimator which seems to give more accurate
> results than e
Thanks Ian.
e
On 12 March 2017 at 21:56, Ian Tickle wrote:
>
> Eleanor,
>
> Phil is right about the bias of the weighted mean, here's how I do it
> using a minimum mean-squared error estimator which seems to give more
> accurate results than either the unweighted or the weighted mean:
>
> http:/
Eleanor,
Phil is right about the bias of the weighted mean, here's how I do it using
a minimum mean-squared error estimator which seems to give more accurate
results than either the unweighted or the weighted mean:
http://staraniso.globalphasing.org/Optimal-F-estimator.pdf
This is actually about
On 11/03/2017 17:37, Renato Mateus Domingos wrote:
Hi
Hi.
I add the sulfinic cysteine in my coordinate map, however I am strugling to
make proper
bonds between the aa chain of the protein and the sulfinic cysteine I added.
the PDB does
not recognize the modified cysteine I added as an amino
It should be the unweighted mean to avoid bias towards I+ or I-
(or Kevin Cowtan had a more complicated way)
Phil
> On 12 Mar 2017, at 17:58, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
>
> You read:
> h k l IPLUS SIGIPLUS INEG SIGINEG
> Then program calculates this:
>
>SIGIMEAN = SIGIPLUS*S
You read:
h k l IPLUS SIGIPLUS INEG SIGINEG
Then program calculates this:
SIGIMEAN = SIGIPLUS*SIGINEG/(SIGIPLUS+SIGINEG)
IMEAN = (IPLUS/SIGIPLUS + INEG/SIGINEG)*SIGIMEAN
ie: IMEAN = ( IPLUS*SIGINEG + INEG * SIGIPLUS ) / /(SIGIPLUS+SIGINEG)
Is that the right thing
