Clemens - what do you mean by "correcting anisostropy"?
On 28/01/2015 07:42, Clemens Vonrhein wrote:
Dear Nicolas,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:21:00PM +, Nicolas Soler wrote:
A quick question regarding the density modification interface via
the Sharp interface. Which resolution range / radi
Dear Nicolas,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:21:00PM +, Nicolas Soler wrote:
> A quick question regarding the density modification interface via
> the Sharp interface. Which resolution range / radius of the solvent
> sphere/ ncycles should be used for optimal result?
I usually don't play around a
Dear Colleague,
The Laboratory of Crystallographic Studies is pleased to announce the 5th
International School on Biological Crystallization (ISBC2015), to be held in
Granada (Spain) during May 24-29, 2015. ISBC2015 is intended for
postgraduate/postdoctoral students and research scientists from
I would try some sort of multi replace residue:
by hand the function is at Extensions -> Modelling -> Replace Residue
Paul.
On 26/01/15 09:59, Almudena Ponce Salvatierra wrote:
Hi Robbie,
thanks a lot. I was suspecting that editing the PDB was probably the
easiest way to go. I will try that!
Isn't it simply FSC? Then according to Wikipedia the citation goes back
even further, 1986 !
Pavel
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Randy Read wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bart Hazes' sftools program does map correlation in resolution shells in
> this way, and may even have been doing it before 1996 if I'm
Hi,
Bart Hazes' sftools program does map correlation in resolution shells in this
way, and may even have been doing it before 1996 if I'm remembering correctly.
Randy
On 27 Jan 2015, at 21:12, Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV wrote:
> Dear Phil,
>
> Gerard Bricogne pointed out a long time ago that the
Dear Phil,
Gerard Bricogne pointed out a long time ago that the clearest comparison
between two sets of phases is the complex correlation coefficient between two
"best" structure factors ( m F exp(i phi) ) - this is equivalent to map
correlation, but can be analysed in resolution bins.
I'm not
On 27 Jan 2015, at 20:25, James Holton wrote:
… snip
> Now you can ask questions about the phase shift. The problem with phases is
> that the phase of weak reflections doesn't really matter because they don't
> contribute to the map. Also, poorly-measured phases get low FOM weights in
> map
The papers you are looking for are:
Crick FHC & Magdoff BS (1956)."The theory of the method of isomorphous
replacement for protein crystals. I", Acta Crystallogr. 9, 901-908.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X56002552
Magdoff BS & Crick FHC (1955)."Ribonuclease II. Accuracy of measurement
and
Thank you so much to all for your kind concern.
Jeorge
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Kay Diederichs <
kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de> wrote:
> Dear Jeorge,
>
> you'll find some information about this in
> http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/xdswiki/index.php/Space_group_determination
>
Obviously it depends on degree of isomorphism - the Riso plot from
SCALEPACK gives you a measure..
It would be hard to sort out phase change due to non-isomorphism v phase
change from error - in measurements, substructure, etc
But a practical guide - when doing phase extension from a SAD set of p
Hi all - anybody know the answer, or can tell me where to look:
Regarding that oft-stated rule-of-thumb from the 60s (Blow? Crick?),
that a 1% change in cell parameters causes a 3% change in intensities:
is there an equivalent statement to be made about how phases change with
increasing non-i
12 matches
Mail list logo
