Dear All,
I tried to convert my x-ray diffraction sca data from HKL200 (.sca file) to
mtz in CCP4 using Scalepack2mtz and it failed, I do not know what should I
supposed to do next to correct the problem, any suggestions are
appreciated. I pasted the message from part of log file below:
ANISOTRO
Dear All,
When I use WinCoot 0.8.1 to open a PDB file, it comes,
Fix Nomenclature Errors. Correct them?
Asp [spec: 1 "A" 128 ""]PHE[spec: 1 "A" 134""]PHE [spec: 1 "A" 371""]
But when I check the 3 residues, I cannot find any error.
Will you let me know the issue?
Dialing
Hi Ayan,
Try 3V:
http://3vee.molmovdb.org
It has worked nicely for me. You'll need to delete the substrate/inhibitor
from your coordinate file for one of the runs.
Cheers,
Chris
On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Bio Physics
wrote:
>
> Hello CCP4bb:
>
> Help me to advice any program/server to cal
Hello CCP4bb:
Help me to advice any program/server to calculate active site volume
without substrate/inhibitor and volume of the substrate/inhibitor itself.
Q-site-finder website is not working.
Thank you,
Ayan
Hello CCP4bb:
Help me to advice any program/server to calculate active site volume
without substrate/inhibitor and volume of the substrate/inhibitor itself.
Q-site-finder website is not working.
Thank you,
Ayan
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Vijay Parashar
wrote:
> A postdoctoral position
On 09/01/15 21:08, Shane Caldwell wrote:
Hi ccp4bb,
Apologies for a cross-post. I previously asked this question on the
pymol-users mailing list, but I thought I'd ask here as well, in case
someone who doesn't follow that bb might have run into my problem
rendering maps in PyMol. I'm starting
Hi ccp4bb,
Apologies for a cross-post. I previously asked this question on the
pymol-users mailing list, but I thought I'd ask here as well, in case
someone who doesn't follow that bb might have run into my problem rendering
maps in PyMol. I'm starting to think it's a non-trival problem to solve.
I always try both methods - usually there is little difference. However,
For CueO (multicopper oxidase) where there are about 25 disordered (unseen)
residues in a loop, using Babinet scaling instead of the default refmac
scaling reduced the R factors by about 2% (both R and Rfree) and improve
Dear Armando,
Is there any reason for using Babinet scaling for bulk solvent correction
> instead of mask based scaling?
>
in addition to Dirk's excellent comment:
Babinet bulk-solvent model is fine at resolutions lower than 15-20Å while
not so much at higher resolutions as demonstrated by Podja
On 01/09/2015 12:11 AM, Jens Kaiser wrote:
In addition to what others have -- correctly -- stated I want to add one
more thing:
Yes, you are right, if you do not get your hands on a monitor with
built-in emitter, you'll need ad least a K4000 and in many cases the
VESA din bracket (~$50). You do
Hi,
I suggest you upgrade to ccp4-6.5 in the first place. I used to have this problem (or a similar one) with the initial 6.4 release but it has been fixed with later updates. In 6.5 it's completely gone (I'm using Centos 6.6)
Cheers,
Boaz
Boaz Shaan
Dear All,
Whenever I start imosflm there was an error message
*iMosflm version 7.1.1, 24th March 2014"ipmosflm" is not compatible.Please
configure iMosflm with the correct executable.on configure*
the imosflm window is closed and there
*Tcl platform is unix x86
Dear all,
I would like to draw your attention to the opening of two Group leader
positions in the Integrated Structural Biology (ISB) department of the
Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology (IGBMC) in Illkirch,
France (http://www.igbmc.fr/research/department/3/). Detailed in
Dear Tobias,
BenQ (Model: XL2411Z - 24"W 3D monitor)
ViewSonic (VX2268wm - 22" 3D monitor)
NVIDIA 3D Vision 2 Kit
1. Both the abovementioned monitors work well on Linux/Ubuntu with the
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 graphics card. You may have to edit the Xorg file for
proper 3D access in BenQ or ViewSoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jacob,
the top-hat profile is one of the reasons why inhouse machines produce
better quality data than synchrotrons. However, the often much
increased resolution you achieve at the synchrotron is generally worth
more than the quality of the data at
On 09.01.2015 08:56, Armando Albert wrote:
Dear all,
Is there any reason for using Babinet scaling for bulk solvent correction
instead of mask based scaling?
Armando
Dear Armando,
yes: the mask bulk solvent correction depends on the proper calculation
of a protein mask. The bulk solvent dens
Hi Ivan,
according to my experience, if you remove at the same time GuHCl and Triton,
you have huge risk of precipitation if the protein is not properly folded.
In my opinion, you have to do something like re-folding. It seems that your
protein could be solubilized from inclusion-body. In the sa
Dear Jens, Jim, Todd and all,
Thanks for your replies and suggestions!
>Yes, you are right, if you do not get your hands on a monitor with
>built-in emitter, you'll need ad least a K4000
That is the reason I was looking for the monitor with built-in emitter,
because then I could use the much che
18 matches
Mail list logo