Unsubscribe
Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Original message From: CCP4BB automatic digest
system Date:08/14/2014 6:00 PM
(GMT-06:00) To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: CCP4BB
Digest - 13 Aug 2014 to 14 Aug 2014 (#2014-220)
There are 17 messages
http://indaproje.com/iletisim/Cath.php
At hellma-analytics dot com, the closest match seems to be catalog
number 176-353-15-40, but, that's an HPLC flow cell.
Daniel Anderson wrote:
Hello, Gloria and everybody,
I'm typing most of this reply from memory.
When I tried to buy one, my recollection was that it was available
from Hellm
Hi,
A crazy solution may be to make a cuvette with a 3D printer. I'm not sure if
the available resins are transparent to DLS.
Best wishes,
Reza
Reza Khayat, PhD
Assistant Professor
The City College of New York
Department of Chemistry, MR-1135
160 Convent Avenue
New York, NY 10031
Tel. (212) 6
Hello, Gloria and everybody,
I'm typing most of this reply from memory.
When I tried to buy one, my recollection was that it was available from
Hellma, but I couldn't (and still can't) find my Hellma paper catalog,
and for some reason I did not find the Hellma web site when I wanted to
buy a
Exactly. Aimless will give you suggested resolution cutoffs based on CC 1/2
in the log file.
Roger Rowlett
On Aug 14, 2014 5:04 PM, "conan仙人指路" wrote:
> Hi Faisal,
>
> CC-half standard is valuable in evaluating the cut-off of highest
> resolution. Sometimes even if I/sigI is close to 1 and com
Does any one know of a source of these cuvettes?
Protein Solution doesn't exist anymore
and Wyatt no longer has these.
Hi Todd,
Do you mean reversible or irreversible dimers?
If the binding is reversible, then once crystal growth starts, Le
Chatelier's principle should take over, pull the equilibrium toward
monomer, and you should see minimal impact of dimer on your "monomer
crystals". The same would be true in r
Hi Faisal,
CC-half standard is valuable in evaluating the cut-off of highest resolution.
Sometimes even if I/sigI is close to 1 and completeness is not as high, if
CC-half is still significant, it may be worth incorporate the extra high-res
shell data and extend the resolution. Again, if only
Dear all
How CC-half value of a data set determines the maximum resolution limit
during data processing ?? Although much we know about the Rsym and I/Isig
values of the highest resolution shell while processing the data, what are
the parameters we need to check related to CC-half values ??
--
Re
Remie,
Look at the following webpage:
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/data/refmac_news.html
The harmonic restraints need to go into a "keyword" file that is uploaded
to the "refmac keyword field" field in the GUI.
Philip
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Remie Fawaz-Touma
wrote:
> Thank y
Thank you Dr. Murshudov for the information. But please I still need help.
In restrained refinement, I could not find where to enter the residues I want
to restrict from moving much. I was only able to find that in rigid body
refinement, so I tried it and got a higher R factor than the initial f
Two postdoc positions are available at the SGC labs at the University of Oxford
to work on the structure and inhibition of human protein kinases. The first is
a Wellcome Trust funded project (CAMSEED) working with Stefan Knapp to develop
inhibitors against the protein kinase CaMK1D in breast can
Dear Kristof,
Apart from things pointed out, a possibility to consider would also be the
presence of two different crystal types--of different compounds--in the same
reaction vessel.
Best regards,
Navdeep
---
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:00:18AM +0200, Kristof Van Hecke wrote:
> Dear,
>
> I’m
Dear Faisal,
at 2.6A resolution I would not call 23A^2 and 24A^2 'a difference',
rather a fluctuation. Parameters are not totally independent from each
other and not from experimental issues.
It most likely also make a difference which program you use. Some
program has a upper cut-off of 100-200 (
Dear Faisal,
The Wilson B-factor is the B-factor of the diffraction data and is calculated
by the data processing software. The B-factor of the atoms is produced by the
refinement program. Ideally the Wilson B (B-factor of the data) and average B
of all atoms (B-factor of the model) should be v
Dear all
How CC-half value of a data set determines the resolution limit for the
data processing ?? Although much we know about the Rsym and I/Isig values
of the highest resolution shell while processing the data, what are the
parameters we need to check related to CC-half values ??
--
Regards
Dear all
I request you to please tell me the difference between wilson B-factor and
average B, all atoms ?? I have two structures one native at 2A resolution,
having mean b factor of 24 and the other a complex structure of the same
protein with a ligand (at 2.6A resolution) has mean b factor of 23
18 matches
Mail list logo