ANNOUNCEMENT
SECOND RESEARCH COORDINATION MEETING (RCM) ON
UTILIZATION OF ACCELERATOR - BASED REAL - TIME METHODS IN INVESTIGATION
OF MATERIALS WITH HIGH TECHNOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE
_24-27 SEPTEMBER
2013_
WEBSITE: http://iaeaupat.wordpress.com/ [1]
VENUE:
Porto Rio hotel
http:
Hi Jan,
If there's no other easy solution at hand, you can consider using PyMOL. In
PyMOL you just load your structures and maps, align the structures, and
then move the maps with the "matrix_copy" command:
# Fetch two proteins and their densities
fetch 1oky 1t46, async=0
fetch 1oky 1t46, type=2f
Hi
You can use Chimera.
http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/
Best
Dr. Anindito Sen
Graduate School of Medicine
University of Tokyo
Sent from my iPad
On 2013/08/30, at 午前12:17, Jan Lohöfener wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we are trying to superimpose several structures together with their electron
Dear Jan,
You can also do this with PyMOL using matrix copy. You need to align the
pdb files first and then you copy its matrix and apply it to the electron
density.
http://www.pymolwiki.org/index.php/Matrix_Copy
Cheers,
Hugo
2013/8/29 Jan Lohöfener
> Dear all,
>
> we are trying to superi
Hi Jan!
Phenix can do that - have a look here:
http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/superpose_maps.htm
Best,
Matthias
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:17:36 +0200
From: lohoefener@mh-hannover.de
Subject: [ccp4bb] Superposition of electron density
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Dear all,
Dear all,
we are trying to superimpose several structures together with their electron
density to show the presence of point mutations. Is there any possibility to
superimpose the electron density together with its structure or to
translate/rotate the electron density alone?
Thanks you,
Jan
Dear colleagues,
This is just a reminder about our next webinar on the coming Wednesday,
September 4th. Allan D'Arcy will give an exciting presentation on "Nucleation
and seeding in protein crystallization". If you have not registered to the
webinar, this is a good time to do so. We are looking
Hi Bernhard,
> But the real objective is – where do data stop making an improvement to the
> model. The categorical statement that all data is good
>
> is simply not true in practice. It is probably specific to each data set &
> refinement, and as long as we do not always run paired refinement a
The 'table 1' is a noun
To 'table 1' is a verb
Why not to develop our language farther..
Felix indeed completely tabled me here. I start to realize now the
inadequacy and incompleteness of my epistemological demonization of Table 1.
Felix' linguistic deconstruction of T(t)able on fact adds
