Re: [ccp4bb] COOT on CentOS 6 (x86_64)

2011-09-11 Thread Paul Emsley
On 12/09/11 00:05, Yuri Pompeu wrote: Hello everyone, Could anyone tell me (or point me to) how to get COOT running on CentOS6 64-bit? It doesnt launch due to failed dependencies, it requires packages that CentOS6 has replaced... I would try the centos5 binaries - if that didn't work, I'd try

[ccp4bb] COOT on CentOS 6 (x86_64)

2011-09-11 Thread Yuri Pompeu
Hello everyone, Could anyone tell me (or point me to) how to get COOT running on CentOS6 64-bit? It doesnt launch due to failed dependencies, it requires packages that CentOS6 has replaced... At least that is what it looks like to me... Cheers,

Re: [ccp4bb] Mac OSX 10.7 Lion

2011-09-11 Thread Sean Seaver
Dear Herbert, I've come across quite a few people that are using mac books as their main development computer. This site ( http://usesthis.com/ ) can be an good way to learn about various setups. A popular trend seems to be using a mac book along with the apple thunderbolt display for more sc

Re: [ccp4bb] Mac OSX 10.7 Lion

2011-09-11 Thread Bosch, Juergen
Regarding MBP versus MBA, one of my graduate students just got a new MBA and her machine is much faster than my MBP 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4 GB RAM. Both machines are running Lion. The new MBA is hot, only disadvantage you can't lock it down, there's no option for it. Jürgen On Sep 10,

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac and DNA

2011-09-11 Thread Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
Le 11/09/2011 00:23, Ed Pozharski a écrit : > On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 08:21 +0200, Miguel Ortiz Lombardía wrote: >> A, C and G are RNA nucleotides. T is (mostly) not, its RNA-equivalent >> is >> uridine phosphate, U. >> >> > > Right, that was my suspicion. But I thought that RNA bases would be Xr,