Hi Engin,
Thanks for the correction. This saved a lot of fancying of mine for moving to
insect cells :-).
Let me also add a little on the yeast side (no personal empirical evidence
either):
wt yeasts generate hypermannosyl N-glycans, which are tens of to more than a
hundred mannose (or m
Hi,
I have never done this myself, but as far as I know, DNA can be directly
conjugated through their primary amino groups to CNBr-activated beads or
NHS-activated agarose beads. These beads are supplied by many companies:
pierce, sigma, biorad, GE healthcare, etc.. - the same thing used for m
John,
I believe my statement is accurate. The Compton & Jones paper you cite states
in the abstract: "Interactions are chiefly with arginine rather than primary
amino groups; the other basic (His, Lys) and aromatic residues (Try, Tyr, and
Phe) give slight responses. The binding behavior is attr
Hi Alex,
Most DNA-binding proteins has decent affinity to heparin columns. Have you
tried purifying your protein over heparin columns?
Cheers,
Raji
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Alexandra Deaconescu
wrote:
> Hello ccp4 enthusiasts:
>
> I am afraid this is a non-ccp4 related question. Can a
Hello ccp4 enthusiasts:
I am afraid this is a non-ccp4 related question. Can anyone recommend an
immobilized dsDNA chromatographic resin for purification of DNA-binding
proteins? GE seems to have something - I was wondering if people have
other recommendations? In the age of GST and His tags
It is not surprising that your bradford and BCA assays don't agree if you
have no aromatic amino acids in your protein. Bradford dye binds to
hydrophobic residues, mainly aromatics, so I would guess your bradford is
consistantly giving lower measurements than the BCA assay. I also wouldn't
be s
At 9:47 AM -0700 4/9/11, Michael Thompson wrote:
Bradford dye binds to hydrophobic residues, mainly aromatics,
The statement above is not accurate.
Compton and Jones. Anal. Biochem. 151(2): 369-374, 1985
- John
--
Michael Thompson a écrit :
There is a very simple and very quick method that yields an answer
approx. 15% reliable: measuring the increment of index of refraction
due to the protein. The measurement of an index of refraction can be
very accurate. You "only" need something like a 5µl drop
It is not surprising that your bradford and BCA assays don't agree if you have
no aromatic amino acids in your protein. Bradford dye binds to hydrophobic
residues, mainly aromatics, so I would guess your bradford is consistantly
giving lower measurements than the BCA assay. I also wouldn't be su
you can do amino acid analysis on your pure protein, using a commercial or
academic service - I hope these are still around. You should only need to do
this once, then relate the result to your A220, BCA and Bradford assays.
Mark
Quoting Arpit Mishra:
> hello everybody
>
> i am working on the
hello everybody
i am working on the protien which dont have any aromatic residue i do fplc
other purification using 220 absorption, but i want to quantitate protein
precisely i have tried using BCA nd bradford but both methods quantification
is not matching,,so any one is having sum idea how to q
11 matches
Mail list logo