If using Linux, definitely a dedicated NVidia - their drivers are the best
supported by far. There are also some issues right now with the drivers for
some of the integrated Intel graphics cards, a bug with handling OpenGL
applications which prevents O, Coot, and PyMOL from working properly, am
NVIDIA NVS 3100M is an entry level card that mostly is designed with
'business applications' in mind - meaning that its
rendering/polygon/3D engine is relatively weak compared to an average
or even low-end modern desktop graphics cards. Nevertheless it is
definitely a step up from an integrated car
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:45 AM, wrote:
> I wanted to know which type of graphics card is more suitable for a
> notebook which is going to be used for structural biology. Integrated or
> dedicated? ATI or NVIDIA? At the moment I have to choose between an
> integrated Intel HD Graphics or a dedic
Dear all,
I wanted to know which type of graphics card is more suitable for a notebook
which is going to be used for structural biology. Integrated or dedicated? ATI
or NVIDIA? At the moment I have to choose between an integrated Intel HD
Graphics or a dedicated NVIDIA NVS 3100M Graphics. Any s
Hi Florian,
Tight NCS restraints or NCS constraints (they are essentially the same
thing in effect if not in implementation) both reduce the effective
parameter count on a 1-for-1 basis.
Restraints should not be considered as being added to the pool of
X-ray observations in the calculation of the
Hi Ethan,
> > mainly because (a) the calculation of likelihood is only based on a
> > subset of the 'data' that are obtained from an X-ray diffraction
> > experiment (for example, we ignore diffuse scattering as Ian
> > pointed-out),
>
> I do not think that is a valid criticism. In any field
