Not to worry- close inspection of the legalese shows that it is the _USES_
of the system that may be intercepted, monitored etc; not the _USERS_.
Of course if by monitoring your _USE_ they discover a good reason
why you the _USER_ should be intercepted, apprehended, and prosecuted,
then all bets
Richard
A paper from some time back which describes this is
Increased resolution data from a large unit cell crystal collected at a
third-generation synchrotron X-ray source Authors: W R Wikoff, W
Schildkamp, J E Johnson Acta crystallographica. Section D, 56(Pt
7):890-3.
By focusing the bending m
I have an R-free set for R32, I want to try scaling the data into say
R3 or C2. How does one keep the R-free flags consistent?
Thanks
FR
-
Francis Reyes M.Sc.
215 UCB
University of Colorado at Boulder
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D
I've had good luck using Phaser on test cases like that, but haven't
had access to a case that was previously unsolved. But in principle
it should work, if the model is good enough.
It sounds like you've thought about the resolution already, so this is
probably redundant. Anyway, the defa
(ignore previous posting)
Meeting Notice: Early registration deadline: June 30th
We invite you to participate in a workshop entitled 'MX Frontiers at the One
Micron Scale' which we are organizing at Brookhaven National Laboratory for
July 23 and 24, 2009. If you examine the workshop's agenda
Meeting Notice: Early registration deadline: June 30th
We invite you to participate in a workshop entitled 'MX Frontiers at the One
Micron Scale' which we are organizing at Brookhaven National Laboratory for
July 23 and 24, 2009. If you examine the workshop's agenda on its website at
http://ww
V. Nagarajan wrote:
Is there some sort of consensus on what properties make a crystal diffract
well or poorly? For example, solvent content is assumed to be critical.
Assumed? Yes. Critical? No. Bernhard Rupp will probably jump on me for
this, but there are plenty of high solvent content cryst
I know that sometimes people like to defocus the x-ray beam at the
sample so that the intensity profile is not sharply peaked. I think
the rationale is that the sharp peak will cause damage, but
contribute few photons to the overall diffraction pattern.
Does anyone know of a reference where
We do see these from time to time with users, but nobody pays
attention to them. It once happened to us a number of years ago.
They were perfectly good looking lysozyme crystals treated with heavy
metal soak. They diffracted fine when fresh, but failed to diffract
at all after a couple mon
Have you tried acorn in ccp4? I've had it work well at this resolution,
especially if the protein/peptide has some alpha helical content. We used
acorn to solve a small cro protein that we couldn't get molecular replacement
to work with by using a 5-residue ideal poly-ala helix as the starting m
I should have added we are currently getting licenses for direct methods
software but right now I do not have that option.
Allen
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Sickmier,
Allen
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 9:27 AM
To: CCP4BB@
Dear All,
In absence to an authoritative answer, I'd like to repost my
question. I guess that the overwhelming majority of routine users
will use this auto-weight, and it be nice to know what happens
there.
1) is there an authoritative description somewhere on the site
what refmac precisely does
I am trying to do molecular replacement on a small peptide (less than 40 AA)
and have not had any success using phaser. Are there any tricks or better
programs for really small peptides?
The data is great 1.1 A, ~35% solvent, and two molecules in the ASU. I have
tried all the standard stuff, cha
I want to compare my experimental resolve phases (before final refinement)
to my model(PDB) phases.
I have tried to compare the model phases vs. experimental phases using:
Sfall (to ensure I have the appropriate PHI columns) -> Cad (for merging
mtz files) -> Phase comparison (Clipper utilities).
Hi Kien,
You may also want to try to wash your column with elution buffer
(without reducing agents), equilibrate it with binding buffer (plus
reducing agents) and then bind your protein.
In the case of HisTrap columns (a pre-packed, Ni(II) resin column),
this procedure is recommended if y
Hi all
I know of a lot of reports that attempt to diagnose twinning from
intensity distributions, however, are there reports that diagnosed
(perfect) twinning from density maps? Strange unmodeled/modeled
density? This is coming from a point of view that a perfectly twinned
structure can
Hi Kien,
DTT coordinates very nicely the Ni(II) on the column. However the
DTT-Ni(II) is prone to oxidation which gives almost immediately Ni(III)
which causes the brownish colour. As Jürgen pointed out TCEP chelates
only weakly Ni(II) and is a better choice. Also beta-mercapto-ethanol
does n
Jürgen Bosch schrieb:
Try TCEP as it does not interfere with the NiNTA resin whereas DTT does.
But why do you care if your column is brown or not - can you elute
your protein ?
Are there other metal ions e.g. iron which bind to your resin perhaps ?
Jürgen
On 19 Jun 2009, at 02:25, Kn Ly wrote
Try TCEP as it does not interfere with the NiNTA resin whereas DTT does.
But why do you care if your column is brown or not - can you elute
your protein ?
Are there other metal ions e.g. iron which bind to your resin perhaps ?
Jürgen
On 19 Jun 2009, at 02:25, Kn Ly wrote:
Hello everyone,
I
Dear all,
I have a data set which is highly anisotropic (3.5-4A in one direction
and 2A in the other) and huge amount of scattering in some rotation
ranges. I know there is the anisotropic correction server which I can
use to do scaling to the weaker data and get it into a kind-of isotropic
21 matches
Mail list logo