The convention for "P22121"s is P21212, which is used by both CNS and CCP4
and many else, if not all. The unit cell needs to be reindexed (a-b-c -->
b-c-a in your case). Then please try again. Lijun
> Thank you for your suggestions.
> 1. The unit cell of my crystal is 47.41 99.67 114.97 90 90
Thank you for your suggestions.
1. The unit cell of my crystal is 47.41 99.67 114.97 90 90 90 space group
P22121, different from PDB structure 64 64 113 90 90 90 P43212, which has
the same growth condition.
2. Mathhews_coef indicate my crystal should be dimer if ~30kD. I used all
monomer, dimer and
Hi Haitao,
I need to ask you a few questions first:
1. Did you mean you could not solve your structure by molecular replacement?
Did you compare your crystal's unit cell with the PDB file? Are they
significantly different? If the assymetric unit has more than one monomer, have
you tried doing
Dear all,
I repeated a protein crystallization which is reported in PDB with the
almost same condition, and got a 2.6A data. But the problem is that I can
not determine the right phases with neither CCP4 nor CNS.
Then I found the protein in my crystal had been degraded from ~30kD to ~20kD
by SDS-
Not sure for other software, but in phenix.refine you can request to
output I*mFo-J*DFc map, where I and J are any user specified values.
Pavel.
On 7/7/2008 6:00 PM, Meyer, Peter wrote:
It is redundant, but it adds an additional step if someone wanted to calculate
something like a 3mFO-2DFc
It is redundant, but it adds an additional step if someone wanted to calculate
something like a 3mFO-2DFc map.
Thanks,
Pete
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Cowtan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 7/7/2008 10:18 AM
To: Meyer, Peter
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Defini
Dear colleagues,
I was able to install and finally run coot under ubuntu. However I
cannot open mtz files and get the following error:
...
>> CCP4 library signal ccp4_parser:Failed to interpret symop string
(Success)
raised in symop_to_mat4 <<
Spacegroup_registry: ASU warning, LGha
Probably because in the classic implementation it is redundant, D being
derived directly from sigmaa.
Some programs refine D and sigmaa (or equivalent terms, such as Lunin's
alpha and beta) separately. This is conceptually equivalent to deriving
D from sigmaa and refining the scale between Fo
Dear colleagues
does anyone know how to change the weighting of the Watson-Crick base
pair restraints using the dna-rna_restraints.def restraints definition
file in CNS? We are working with rather low resolution structures and I
would like the restraints to be a bit tighter than they are by de
Hi Pete,
phenix.refine outputs it all the time.
Pavel.
On 7/7/2008 7:59 AM, Meyer, Peter wrote:
Slightly off-topic from the original question, but is there a reason that most
programs don't output D for sigma_a coefficients?
Pete
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board on beh
Ariel Talavera wrote:
Hi all,
I am working with a 2.5 Å resolution structure with Wilson B factor
37,5 Ų. It is already 100 % built but after the TLS refinement the
average B factor was quiet low (4.6 Ų) and of course also the B
factors for each atom were also very low. For that reason I ra
Slightly off-topic from the original question, but is there a reason that most
programs don't output D for sigma_a coefficients?
Pete
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Mayer, Mark (NIH/NICHD) [E]
Sent: Sat 7/5/2008 2:39 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4
Hi all,
I am working with a 2.5 Å resolution structure with Wilson B factor 37,5
Ų. It is already 100 % built but after the TLS refinement the average B
factor was quiet low (4.6 Ų) and of course also the B factors for each
atom were also very low. For that reason I ran TLSANL program to res
Structural Biologist - permanent position
Central London
(Reference XR0708)
Cancer Research Technology (CRT) is a specialist technology transfer company
which develops discoveries arising from Cancer Research UK and worldwide
prestigious oncology organisations into potential therapies and d
Hi,
Many thanks to all who replied to my enquiry about the weakest protein-
protein complex crystallised. The idea that crystals themselves are
weak complexes had already crossed my mind and I was glad to hear it
confirmed by others. My impression is that there are no hard and fast
rules,
You almost certainly have a wrong format statement - it is tricky
getting them correct for more complex cns inputs.
Eleanor
Miller, Mitchell D. wrote:
You could also try cns2mtz?
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~cowtan/cns2mtz/cns2mtz.html
Regards,
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bul
Hi,
bit off topic, but would anyone have baculovirus
vectors that co-express GFP for checking infection (i dont want a fusion
protenin) ??? such as the pUltraBac-1 by
Philipps B, Rotmann D, Wicki M, Mayr LM, Forstner M.
Time reduction and process optimization of the baculovirus expression system
17 matches
Mail list logo