Hi all,
thanks a lot for the various responses. When I tried to use a map as the
serach model, I ran into various problems:
again, the starting point is a weak, yet convincing molecular replacement
solution in the hexagonal crystal form (1mol/asu) and no MR solution in P1
(2mol/asu, 2-fold in SRF).
On Nov 3 2007, Randy J. Read wrote:
Depends on the purpose. From the LLG, I want to see that it is positive
(negative means that I'm being too optimistic about the quality of the
model, i.e. the RMS error is higher or the completeness lower than
assumed), and I would like to see it increase as
If you take a PDB file from the solution for the hexagonal form as your
input model for a translation search in P1, then the cross-rotation peaks
that rotate the hexagonal data onto the P1 data should be the correct
orientations. (Phaser uses the same definition for Euler angles as ALMN.)
I'd g
On Nov 2 2007, Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
neglecting e-density, packing, etc. - what matters most to people when
running phaser - LLG or Z-score? in what function (RF, TF)?
Depends on the purpose. From the LLG, I want to see that it is positive
(negative means that I'm being too optimistic about
Thanks Ben,
Yes, I am acutely aware that our interface has got out-of-date.
I can add in these little fixes.
If there is sufficient interest, we could talk about updating to
the python version.
Cheers
Martyn
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Ben Webb
Sent: Fri
